Johnson, Dietrick Lewis Sr. ( 2015 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JEANNETTE J.CLACK WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PHlL|p J_ DEVL{N
CLERK OFCOURT ' 501 west s"' street, suite 1100 CHIEFDEPW
Austin, Texas 78701 '
August 19, 2015 _ RECE|VED |N
t COURT oF chMlNAL APPEALS
Court of Criminal Appeals `` , ‘
P.o. Box 12308 r AUB 21 2015
Austin, Texas 78711
To Whorn lt May Concern, AbezAcoSta, Clerk
The enclosed documents were received on August 17, 2015. It appears they were addressed to
us in error and are intended for your court.
If this office can assist you in any other manner, please let us know.
Very truly yours,
JEANNETTE J. CLACK, Clerk
By:_Deputy Clerk/AD
CC: Dietrick Lewis Johnson, Sr.
’ dyeing Lv ~g_:;m§-W 3a . ga.$g;z'@|
\‘LZS\~Q?B RECElvED IN
40
CQJQL' Q’ v d gg,q.éd~to,§ gm adm(;L_;,¢ QW¢YOURT oF chMINALAPPEALs
, ``; / ‘ >Q 9§=,@'~\©
é?``, _<¢, %C»AQMQN'." ``T&xo/§ 7773© _AUG 212015
37;/,¢~@" Aeeiaeesraelerk``
1\1 \¥\§. C¢;)C‘T" &F QQ~;/\A:'{NAL. AYQEAL">
QF “‘T’é>¢,QS
‘\>c>, \A)Q’ XZ) SSQD.~@\
':’N §§ >:-.:EjQ-r¢;\< LL=,V¢:§ ;._;'L;H\\§¢M §Aj M
'\/\\ AO()\_T<;AT~'L*>¢\\ grid v\/?_~" ¢\F M.§N>AML>§ '
TCAQ§¢ /\@§ 91::2;2:»~1 ama 3\~=¢ 31;>33 ;)@1;,)’ 21¢:1»33 3\‘1 'Z\SSl-t &\\h
\DA=:; :M M§T~:Q\( AQ@:L \§ ,3¢3\§ 8@\“ wmerL
¢HQN& £em~¢>§ \,\/G’¢¢ cJ-;"'.'t-mél_\ 8 "T\;is 02@4/§:;':¢,\\
. /
§ " /\/§» , __ \¢JAS _T(r\\j €q\/c¢<\ i§‘-' lM€ >6&~§£.
Q - l '._F-. l _' ”" c __' .§
¢= é’." " E§ 51 £T’ZM£N‘."' csc '_'£'/\AM‘T'A¢\T F:<\<"’."S
:\:\££``£ .TL>\ &/{em>§\.c'r' £QL& nF
':'~J.'t``\xg§.$‘ .'_;Me§¢_l"d\,x.`` \ @"7' \A)£“‘"``“"z:€ l-\AR
>…Q (``/\0\\ 1~§ \_c_'°'."TSL``§ c\}€<=~" T'r./\~ \ \£§L\_t§&_
CQNSG L A\h> s’."‘»';z g \,J£J.'£ )"'E »MEI \/n€&;¢§m»o"'” .:r~(~
T§§,§§ AN> ML,M¢~, >>¢mmsmq‘:;-a /52&3§11:'.¢>.::.4¢
Wl',‘;§(‘ml\a.p:.``r‘.l
/
/"'1'¢.'>'\\1 SQ)d/\i 13€>\§
F\S``J\P am "TFFa
Ql-im\i€ At\i?__' ND\A/ EML U\x";"a> \l-i*;.;``é LT.'/\.\E cf
\/C.zNC \rJl-l/-VTC_‘ \m) A£Z
141 , , §»_
' 101¢\1"‘" m\t&&m\d \n/E;LL_ .1HA'1" 5 Er\\m_deG-i AFT+AT »»
"' ')
(/mE-.~_ 11:31)_ 1116 L§@b §§ ``/``\/_\_€ac:-€L,L Aoa-:L-!
iva 1,.,;‘.\;9§‘ 1137 ,TSA\.L' CA§1§5§11‘°°" g \_L‘,
3 CFL. \D'. 511 TSA:AH \'. \'Z
.-.\-t@\_A/we£., ::: ¥&A> 1\1}_1l 411 1 §§ L.as';'
‘ d ' `` ‘1’/(``¢~/\15"’1511'\.”1_``| 1§"1.'¢&’\ Q/\\~ -\_Y'i£,-
``/
.:v ‘ 1
01 >1"&/\1».
QA§£ 1\1;:>. li. LZC:Z>``“@M~ "'"°“'°"“F
1 ” 3 1€'._:"_:’> _ § CE 1€1',~;;1€~.1'55"1'_ ..»;Q.»;.
_,/ 4 _ f ~ ~ / .-
\ 91 .1``.' .,1_ -",.; item l '~.
311 L~;-递°\i\ _V\c§; ``d§g,§ 1
'\31€\,.`` "'1\``_¥1'¢1~\§ \h._> 1'¢\1 A>\[ch_€ §§ 159\);:§1@
‘_"'& ~/' gm 1 ‘_<> ‘_&j_¢;§oém_:> (‘§1£"
(.§. :AN'\ t\\C‘>\ {V\A``D FS``T'\H ADKIL§ _L\’b 1\11>1/\/\1\'3/1§4<§
_”E_Qg§§_§;@!v\€r\~ §:1\1 §§ oim\.dv€ EL§_¢ ”75``1§``1
/ ' (-\ d "'I'AM A \~bC@Kéé§ .»q\\> .1 3~;_~ é. ;§"_Y' ~ `` "1\11:11." 'C.~
`` CD ?-"_=?L>,_: ~
c ;:'~Jz~_..
e'*i-LTC
W219-81234-2012-HC cp 523
mf.f.r_y
§ ~¢x°iu§ ..
53 E>
In the ;_’ 55 o >.
, "'~ co
Ex parte Dietrick Lewis 'Johnson
§
§ _
§ 219th District Court
§
§
' of Collin County, Texas ~
Request to Designate Issues
il
The State of Texas moves this Court to enter an order designati- g
issues of controverted, previously unresolved fact to be resolved.
j 1.
On May 14, 2014; the Clerk served the State with the Application for
writ of habeas corpus filed lby Dietrick Lewis Johnson (Applicant) pursuant
to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. ll.07.
2.
An application filed under Article ll.07 provides for a prompt review
by the trial court to determine Whether the application alleges any facts that
iftrue, could entitle the applicant to relief See art 11.07, § 3(_0``). li"th,e court
determines ~that controverted fact issues do exist, it shall enter an order
designating the issues of fact to be resolved Ia'. § 3(d); see Martin v.
Hamlin, 25 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex. Crim. A.pp. 2000) (holding the trial court
has a duty to designate issues if it determines a habeas application contains
controverted issues). Upon entry of an order designating issues, the clerk
need not forward the application ».to the Court of Criminal Appeals for 180
days. TeX. R. App. P. 73.4(b)(5).
``3.4
Applicant was convicted of aggravated kidnapping after a plea
bargain and sentenced to 60 years’ confinement l
4.
Applicant alleges prosecutorial misconduct, that his plea bargain is
not being followed, ineffective assistance _of trial ' counsel, and actual
innocence claims.
5.
_ The State generally denies each of Applicant’s allegations The State
believes there are controverted issues cof fact material to Applicant’s
incarceration The State therefore requests that this Court enter an order
designating such issues and the manner of their resolution so that it may,
after the issues are resolved, submit a response to assist the Court in making
its findings of fact and conclusions of law.