Garry L. Rollins and Carla D. Rollins v. Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A "A-1 Rent All" ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                   ACCEPTED
    12-15-00121-CV
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    7/31/2015 3:40:32 PM
    CATHY LUSK
    CLERK
    No. 12-15-00121-CV
    __________________________________________________________________
    FILED IN
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS      12th COURT   OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    FOR THE TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    7/31/2015 3:40:32 PM
    TYLER, TEXAS
    CATHY S. LUSK
    __________________________________________________________________
    Clerk
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D. ROLLINS,
    Appellants
    V.
    TEXAS COLLEGE AND
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A "A-1 RENT ALL,"
    Appellees
    __________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from Cause No. 13-3353-A
    In the 7th District Court of Smith County, Texas
    __________________________________________________________________
    APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
    TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF
    DUE TO CORRECTION AND SUPPLEMENTATION
    OF RECORD
    _____________________________________________________________
    EXPEDITED RULING REQUESTED
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Appellants, Gary L. Rollins and Carla Rollins request an
    extension of time to file Appellant’s Opening Brief and would shows
    as follows:
    Appellees are Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC d/b/a
    “A-1 Rent All." The current deadline to file Appellants Opening Brief
    is August 10, 2015.         Appellant requests an extension of the
    deadline to file the Appellants Opening Brief, extending the time
    until September 10, 2015. One prior extension to file Appellant’s
    Opening Brief has been granted. There is no 15 day limit after the
    deadline for filing this motion. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 38.6(d) this Court may grant this extension request.
    1.   THE RECORD IS STILL INCORRECT
    Appellants need additional time to file Appellant’s Opening
    Brief because the record is still incomplete and in need of
    supplementation and correction. On July 6, Appellants filed their
    first unopposed motion to correct the record. See, FIRST UNOPPOSED
    MOTION   FOR   EXTENSION (Exhibit “A”). Ultimately, this Court granted
    the motion and ordered the trial court clerk to file a corrected
    record by July 29, 2015. See ORDER GRANTING MOTION        TO   CORRECT
    RECORD (Exhibit “B”).
    The trial court clerk did not file the corrected record on July
    29, 2015. Instead, the trial court clerk, requested additional time
    due to “UNFORSEEN REASONS.” See TRIAL COURT CLERK’S REQUEST
    FOR   EXTENSION (Exhibit “C”).      This Court granted the request
    yesterday.    See Order Granting Trial Clerks Request to Extend
    (Exhibit “D”). It extended the deadline for the trial court clerk to file
    a corrected record to and including August 31, 2015.
    2.    THE RECORD IS STILL INCOMPLETE
    During the same time period, the Appellant and one Appellee,
    MPF Investments, had requested supplementation of the record.
    See FORMAL REQUEST     TO   SUPPLEMENT RECORD and CROSS DESIGNATION
    OF   MPF (Exhibits “E” and “F”).     It was assumed (and has been
    requested) that the trial court clerk would file the corrected record
    and the supplemental record as one complete filing on July 29,
    2015. However, due to the extension given to the trial court clerk,
    neither a corrected nor supplemented record has been filed. Thus,
    many documents necessary for reference by both parties are still
    missing from the record.
    3.    GRANTING THIS MOTION WILL BENEFIT THE PROCESS.
    If Appellant is forced to file its leading brief on the current due
    date of August 10, 2015, it will necessarily be filed prior to the filing
    of the corrected record, which is now not due to be filed with this
    Court until August 31, 2015. As a result, Appellant will be forced
    to   use   unofficial   and   differently   paginated   versions   of   the
    documents from the record. This will require using references that
    will be different from the official record bookmarks, and create
    confusion.    However, because the official corrected record will be
    filed by the dates on which the Appellees briefs will be due, those
    briefs will necessarily have citations to the official corrected record.
    Thus, the Appellees cited documents will have different names and
    page references from those in Appellants’ brief. This will increase
    the workload on this Court because the briefs of the parties will be
    riddled with differing references to the same documents. This can
    be avoided by granting this motion.         If the motion is granted the
    record will be clean, complete, and consistent for all parties and the
    Court.
    4.    GRANTING THIS “UNOPPOSED” MOTION WILL PREJUDICE NO ONE.
    This motion is unopposed. Granting this motion will prejudice
    no one.    This motion does not seek undue delay.         It requests an
    extension to merely ten days after the date on which official
    corrected and supplemented record should be filed.
    WHEREFORE, Appellants pray that the Court grant this
    unopposed request and extend the deadline for Appellants to file
    their opening brief to and including September 10, 2015.
    Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    WALKER SIGMON LAW
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I certify that I have conferred with lead appellate counsel for
    Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC by phone and by e-mail
    on the following occasions:
    • July 31, 2015, by email with copy of this motion. On July 31st,
    2015 they both advised me that they were unopposed to this
    motion,
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that on July 31st, 2015, I served a copy of Appellants’
    Motion to Extend Time to File Appellants’ Brief on the parties listed
    below by electronic service and that the electronic transmission was
    reported as complete. My e-mail address is esigmon@esigmon.com.
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    Greg Smith
    Texas Bar No. 18600600
    Nolan D. Smith
    Texas Bar No. 24075632
    RAMEY & FLOCK, P.C.
    100 E. Ferguson, Suite 500
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Telephone: 903-597-3301
    Facsimile: 903-597-2413
    Mr. Trey Yarbrough
    YARBROUGH WILCOX GUNTER, PLLC
    100 East Ferguson, Suite 1015
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Fax: 903.595.0191
    Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Texas Bar No. 10059825
    hovnatanian@mdjwlaw.com
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
    WISDOM, L.L.P.
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    Todd M. Lonergan
    Texas Bar No. 12513700
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    Ryan K. Geddie
    Texas Bar No. 24055541
    geddie@mdjwlaw.com
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
    WISDOM, L.L.P.
    Tollway Plaza One
    16000 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 800
    Dallas, Texas 75248
    (214) 420-5500 – Telephone
    (214) 420-5501 – Facsimile
    Exhibit  “A”
    ACCEPTED
    12-15-00121-CV
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    7/6/2015 12:15:27 PM
    CATHY LUSK
    CLERK
    No. 12-15-00121-CV
    __________________________________________________________________
    FILED  IN
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS      12th  COURT  OF  APPEALS
    TYLER,  TEXAS
    FOR THE TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    7/6/2015  12:15:27  PM
    TYLER, TEXAS
    CATHY  S.  LUSK
    __________________________________________________________________
    Clerk
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D. ROLLINS,
    Appellants
    V.
    TEXAS COLLEGE AND
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A "A-1 RENT ALL,"
    Appellees
    __________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from Cause No. 13-3353-A
    In the 7th District Court of Smith County, Texas
    __________________________________________________________________
    APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
    TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF
    _____________________________________________________________
    EXPEDITED RULING REQUESTED
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Appellants, Gary L. Rollins and Carla Rollins request an
    extension of time to file Appellant’s Opening Brief and would shows
    as follows:
    Appellees are Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC d/b/a
    “A-1 Rent All." The current deadline to file Appellants Opening Brief
    is July 10, 2015.     Appellant requests an additional 30 days to file
    the Appellants Opening Brief, extending the time until August 10,
    2015 (the Monday after the expiration of 30 days from July 10,
    2015).    No prior extensions to file Appellant’s Opening Brief have
    been requested. There is no 15 day limit after the deadline for filing
    this motion. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d)
    this Court may grant this extension request.
    Appellants need additional time to file Appellant’s Opening
    Brief    because    the   record   is   incomplete   and        in   need     of
    supplementation and correction.         A copy of Appellants’ Motion to
    Supplement the Clerk’s Record is attached hereto (Exhibit “A”).
    First, the record is missing 4 necessary documents.              These
    missing documents were discovered by Appellants while preparing
    their brief. Three of these documents were designated for inclusion
    by Appellants, but were not filed as part of the record by the clerk.
    The fourth document is cross-designated by Appellee, MPF
    Investments LLC.      However, due to the tardiness of MPF’s cross-
    designation the fourth document is not in the record either.
    The   undersigned   discussed    the   absence     of    these      four
    documents with the trial court clerk and was informed that due to
    the July 4th holiday, the matter would be handled on Tuesday, July
    7, 2015 (only 3 days prior to the filing deadline.)      A copy of
    correspondence to the trial court clerk requesting supplementation
    of the record with such documents, is attached as exhibit “B”.
    Attached as Exhibit “C” is a copy of e-mail correspondence with the
    trial court clerk confirming the timeline. Obviously, it is unlikely
    that the record will be properly supplemented prior to Appellants’
    briefing deadline.
    Second,    numerous    additional   documents    were   cross-
    designated for inclusion by Appellee, MPF Investments, LLC. The
    cross designation was filed just recently and received by the
    undersigned just yesterday, long after the clerk’s record had been
    completed and filed.    A copy of the tardy cross designation is
    attached as exhibit “D.”   The designation specified a number of
    documents which suggest additional areas of briefing will be
    required. Thus, in order to avoid confusion and inaccuracy in the
    briefs, the clerk’s record page numbers should be assigned to these
    key documents, prior to briefing.
    Appellants do not object to the tardy designation. Appellants
    simply desire for the record to be complete with proper volume and
    page references prior to drafting and filing their opening brief.
    Extending the deadline 30 days will accommodate all parties, by
    giving the trial clerk ample time to insure that the clerk’s record is
    complete   and    contains     all   documents   requested.   Granting
    additional time will not prejudice any party, but simply insure the
    record is complete.
    Wherefore, Appellants pray that the Court grant this request
    and extend the deadline for Appellants’ to file their opening brief for
    30 days, extending the time until August 10, 2015 (the Monday
    after the expiration of 30 days from July 10).
    Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    WALKER SIGMON LAW
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I certify that I have attempted to confer with lead counsel for
    Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC by phone and by e-mail
    on the following occasions:
    • July 3, 2015, by phone and then by email.               I initially
    attempted to contact lead trial counsel for the parties (i.e.
    Messrs. Yarbrough and Geddie).      I got email responses from
    both lawyers directing me to include lead appellate counsel on
    all correspondence going forward.
    • On July 4, 2015 I sent written correspondence to Messrs.
    Smith and Hovnatanian (both lead appellate counsel) with trial
    counsel cc’d.   In the correspondence, I asked the lawyers to
    consider the merit and substance of the motions as well as my
    rationale for filing them.   I also invited opposing counsel to
    advise me at their earliest of their position on the motions.
    • On July 6, 2015 I called Mr. Smith and Mr. Hovnatanian by
    phone. Mr. Hovnatanian advised me that he is unopposed to
    the motion to extend the filing deadline. I was unable to reach
    Mr. Smith and emailed him at 11;29 a.m. regarding the
    motion. Nolan Smith contacted me by phone at 11:57 a.m. on
    behalf of his colleague Greg Smith, advising me that he too is
    unopposed to the motion to extend the brief filing deadline.
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    WALKER SIGMON LAW
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that on July 6, 2015, I served a copy of Appellants’
    Motion to Extend Time to File Appellants’ Brief on the parties listed
    below by electronic service and that the electronic transmission was
    reported as complete. My e-mail address is esigmon@esigmon.com.
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    Greg Smith
    Texas Bar No. 18600600
    Nolan D. Smith
    Texas Bar No. 24075632
    RAMEY & FLOCK, P.C.
    100 E. Ferguson, Suite 500
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Telephone: 903-597-3301
    Facsimile: 903-597-2413
    Mr. Trey Yarbrough
    YARBROUGH WILCOX GUNTER, PLLC
    100 East Ferguson, Suite 1015
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Fax: 903.595.0191
    Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Texas Bar No. 10059825
    hovnatanian@mdjwlaw.com
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
    WISDOM, L.L.P.
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    Todd M. Lonergan
    Texas Bar No. 12513700
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    Ryan K. Geddie
    Texas Bar No. 24055541
    geddie@mdjwlaw.com
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
    WISDOM, L.L.P.
    Tollway Plaza One
    16000 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 800
    Dallas, Texas 75248
    (214) 420-5500 – Telephone
    (214) 420-5501 – Facsimile
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    EXHIBIT!A!
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    No. 12-15-00121-CV
    __________________________________________________________________
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    __________________________________________________________________
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D. ROLLINS,
    Appellants
    V.
    TEXAS COLLEGE AND
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A "A-1 RENT ALL,"
    Appellees
    __________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from Cause No. 13-3353-A
    In the 7th District Court of Smith County, Texas
    __________________________________________________________________
    APPELLANTS’ MOTION
    TO CORRECT AND SUPPLEMENT CLERK’S RECORD
    _____________________________________________________________
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Appellants, Gary L. Rollins and Carla Rollins request that this
    Court issue a letter directing the trial court clerk to correct and
    supplement the clerk’s record and to re-file the record in proper
    format and would shows as follows:
    Appellees are Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC d/b/a
    “A-1 Rent All."
    1.     OMITTED ITEMS
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1) provides:
    (c) Supplementation.
    (1) If a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's
    record, the trial court, the appellate court, or any party may by
    letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in
    the appellate court a supplement containing the omitted item.
    Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(1).
    A. APPELLANTS’ FOUR ITEMS
    During the process of preparing their brief, Appellants
    discovered that four (4) relevant documents have been omitted from
    the clerk’s record. They are:
    1.   “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider its Ruling On Defendant
    MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All’s Traditional
    and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and
    Objections to Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence”
    (with attached exhibits and affidavit from Dr. Samuel
    Barnett) (filed March 2, 2015).
    2.   "Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in
    Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s
    Ruling on Defendant’s Traditional and “No Evidence”
    Motion for Summary Judgment” (filed March 19, 2015)
    3.   "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the
    Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Traditional and No
    Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment (Texas College)"
    (issued by the trial court on March 17, 2015)
    4.    "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to reopen
    Summary Judgment Record and Request for Leave to
    Supplement Evidence” (issued by the trial court on
    March 17, 2015).
    Items 1, 3, and 4, were designated by Appellant for inclusion in the
    record prior to the date on which the clerk’s record was filed. See
    APPELLANT’S DESIGNATION    OF ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN   CLERK’S RECORD
    (Exhibit “A”). Item 2 was inadvertently omitted by Appellants from
    their designation. However the same document was recently cross-
    designated    by   Appellee   MPF   Investments    LLC.       See    MPF
    INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION    OF ITEMS FOR    CLERK’S RECORD
    (Exhibit “B”). However, due to the tardiness of MPF’s cross-
    designation item 2 is not in the record either.
    The     undersigned   discussed   the   absence    of   these   four
    documents with the trial court clerk and was informed that due to
    the July 4th holiday, the matter would be handled on Tuesday, July
    7, 2015, only 3 days prior to the deadline for Appellants to file their
    opening brief.     This motion is being filed concurrently with
    APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF (Exhibit
    “C.”) A copy of correspondence to the trial court clerk requesting
    supplementation of the record with such documents, is attached as
    exhibit “D”.    Attached as Exhibit “E” is a copy of e-mail
    correspondence with the trial court clerk confirming the effort to
    locate these documents.
    These four items are relevant to this appeal. Although a letter
    request from Appellees has already been sent to the trial clerk, this
    motion is filed out of an abundance of caution with respect to these
    four items. Appellants request this Court to direct the trial clerk to
    include these items in a supplemental record.
    B. MPF’S 30 ADDITIONAL DESIGNATED ITEMS
    Thirty (30) documents (including item 2 from the list above)
    were cross-designated for inclusion by Appellee, MPF Investments,
    LLC. The cross-designation was filed just recently and received by
    the undersigned just yesterday, long after the clerk’s record had
    been completed and filed.      See MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-
    DESIGNATION OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD (Exhibit “B”).
    Appellants do not object to the late cross designation, but
    merely seek to have this Court insure the designation is also
    fulfilled by the trial court clerk. This can be accomplished by the
    issuance of a letter from this Court directing the inclusion of such
    items in the recently requested supplemental record.            Such an
    action will group both the Appellants’ and Appellees’ recent
    requests together, insuring they will both end up in 1 supplemental
    record. This will avoid multiplicity of effort by the trial court clerk.
    2.   DEFECTS IN THE RECORD
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5 (d) provides:
    (d) Defects or Inaccuracies. If the clerk's record is defective or
    inaccurate, the appellate clerk must inform the trial court
    clerk of the defect or inaccuracy and instruct the clerk to
    make the correction.
    Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(d).
    In preparing their brief, Appellants’ have determined that the
    vast majority of the items included in the current clerk’s record are
    not text-searchable, and not bookmarked at the first page.           This
    format is required by the Texas Supreme Court’s Order Directing
    the form of the Appellate Record, Rule 1.2 which reads:
    1.2. Filing an Electronic Clerk's Record.
    Unless the clerk receives permission from the appellate
    court to file the record in paper form, the clerk must file the
    record electronically. When filing a clerk's record in electronic
    form, the trial court clerk must:
    (a) file each computer file in text-searchable Portable
    Document Format (PDF);
    (b) create electronic bookmarks to mark the first page of
    each document in the clerk's record; ….
    Tex. R. App. P. Appendix C.
    Below is an exemplar of how the bookmarks (on the left in
    grey) are supposed to appear.      This exemplar was taken from a
    clerk training video provided on this Court’s website:
    The exemplar clearly shows each document bookmarked with a
    separate descriptive title.
    Below is a view of the clerk’s record vol. 1 in this case:
    By looking at the left, one can clearly see that the entire volume is
    marked with only one book mark, when in fact, the volume contains
    many separate documents.      This is evidenced by the clerk’s own
    index for volume 1 shown below:
    Appellant requests this Court to order the trial court clerk to
    bookmark the individual documents. Because each party is
    required to furnish a bookmarked Appendix with its brief, this will
    eliminate inconsistencies in the appendices of the parties, and
    eliminate undue burden of document conversion on the part of the
    Appellants.
    Furthermore, although Appellant is unable to represent the
    problem graphically, the documents contained in the record are not
    text-searchable   as   required   by   the   Supreme   Court’s   order.
    Appellants request this Court to order the trial court clerk to file
    the record (to the extent feasible) in text-searchable format.   Again,
    this will reduce the burden on the Appellants and Appellees when
    creating their appendices for this Court, which must be text-
    searchable as well.    This Courts website has a video which can be
    of great use by the clerk in learning how to make the record comply
    with the Supreme Court’s order:
    http://www.txcourts.gov/12thcoa/practice-before-the-
    court/electronic-filing/clerks-and-court-reporters.aspx
    It is suggested that this Court direct the clerk to comply with the
    video in preparing the record.
    WHEREFORE, Appellants pray that this Court: (1) send a
    letter instruction to the trial court clerk, directing the trial court
    clerk to include the four (4) items listed above and the thirty (30)
    items   designated   by   Appellee,   MPF   Investments,   LLC   in   a
    supplemental record to be filed with this court, and (2) direct the
    trial court clerk by order to refile the original record and the
    supplemental record with the requisite bookmarks in a text-
    searchable format as required by the Texas Supreme Court.
    Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    WALKER SIGMON LAW
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I certify that I have attempted to confer with lead counsel for
    Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC by phone and by e-mail
    on the following occasions: July 3, 2015, but counsel has not
    responded to my attempts.
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    WALKER SIGMON LAW
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that on July 3, 2015, I served a copy of Appellants’
    Motion to Correct and Supplement Clerk’s Record on the parties
    listed   below   by   electronic   service   and    that   he   electronic
    transmission was reported as complete.             My e-mail address is
    esigmon@esigmon.com.
    /s/ Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    State Bar No. 24010397
    LAW OFFICES OF ERNESTO D. SIGMON
    WALKER SIGMON LAW
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    214/395-1546 (Telephone)
    713/485-6056 (Facsimile)
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D.
    ROLLINS
    Greg Smith
    Texas Bar No. 18600600
    Nolan D. Smith
    Texas Bar No. 24075632
    RAMEY & FLOCK, P.C.
    100 E. Ferguson, Suite 500
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Telephone: 903-597-3301
    Facsimile: 903-597-2413
    Mr. Trey Yarbrough
    YARBROUGH WILCOX GUNTER, PLLC
    100 East Ferguson, Suite 1015
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Fax: 903.595.0191
    Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Texas Bar No. 10059825
    hovnatanian@mdjwlaw.com
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
    WISDOM, L.L.P.
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    Todd M. Lonergan
    Texas Bar No. 12513700
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    Ryan K. Geddie
    Texas Bar No. 24055541
    geddie@mdjwlaw.com
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON &
    WISDOM, L.L.P.
    Tollway Plaza One
    16000 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 800
    Dallas, Texas 75248
    (214) 420-5500 – Telephone
    (214) 420-5501 – Facsimile
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    EXHIBIT!B!
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    2929 Allen Parkway - Suite 200
    Houston, TX 77019
    (Tel) 214.395.1546 · (Fax) 713.485.6056
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    July 2, 2015
    VIA EMAIL
    Linda Rhymes
    Smith County District Clerk - Appeals
    100 North Broadway
    Room 204
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Re:            Formal Request to Supplement the Clerk’s Record in Gary L. Rollins and Carla
    D. Rollins v. Texas College et. al., in the 7th Judicial District of Smith, County
    Texas.
    Dear Ms. Rhymes:
    On May 8th, 2015 our office filed a request for mandatory items to be included in the Clerk’s
    record of this matter. We recently discovered that the following items are missing from the
    record:
    1) “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider its Ruling On Defendant MPF
    Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All’s Traditional and No Evidence
    Motion for Summary Judgment and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Summary
    Judgment Evidence” (with attached exhibits and affidavit from Dr. Samuel
    Barnett)
    2) "Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to
    Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s
    Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion for Summary Judgment”
    3) "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on
    Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment
    (Texas College)"
    4) "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to reopen Summary
    Judgment Record and Request for Leave to Supplement Evidence”
    Item #1 was electronically filed on March 2, 2015. While I did not save a file stamped copy of
    the lead document once accepted, I am including a screen shot of the accepted submission for
    ease of reference (unfortunately the links to the actual documents have expired). Please note that
    the exhibits to the motion are also listed below:
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    Counsel Geddie Ltr 8.12.14
    Ms. Linda Rhymes
    July 2, 2015
    Page 2 of 3
    Item #2 was cross-designated by defendant MPF on June 29, 2015 but does not appear in the
    record.
    Items #3 and #4 are attached for reference as requested (filed stamped photocopies taken from
    our file).
    Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5, this correspondence serves as a formal
    request that you prepare, certify and file in the appellate court a supplement containing the
    omitted items referenced above.
    We greatly appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate if you have any
    questions or concerns. Thank you in advance.
    Sincerely,
    /s/Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Sigmon Law, PLLC
    2929 Allen Parkway
    Suite 200
    Houston, TX 77019
    Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellants
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    Clerk Ltr 7.2.15
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    EXHIBIT!C!
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    From:    Ernesto Sigmon esigmon@esigmon.com
    Subject:   13-3353-A Clerk's Record
    Date:   July 2, 2015 at 2:47 PM
    To:   lrhymes@smith-county.com
    Cc:    stuart starry stuart@starrylaw.com
    Linda
    We are missing the following items from the record:
    1) “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider its Ruling On Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion
    for Summary Judgment and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence with attached exhibits and affidavit from Dr. Samuel
    Barnett” - Appearing on p. 4192 of the record (p. 3 of Plaintiffs’ Clerk Record Request).
    2) "Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s
    Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion for Summary Judgment (filed 3/19/15)” - Item 29 of MPF’s cross designation filed June 29th.
    3) 3/17/15 - "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for
    Summary Judgment (Texas College)."
    4) 3/17/15    - "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to reopen Summary Judgment Record and Request for Leave to Supplement
    Evidence”
    Items 1,3 and 4 were designated by Plaintiffs but do not appear in the record. Item 2 was designated by defendant MPF but does not appear
    in the record. We would like your guidance on the most efficient path to rectifying this situation and creating a full and corrected record as this
    will impact our briefing deadline to the appeals court. Please advise at your earliest. Thank you.
    Ernesto
    ________________________________________________
    Ernesto Sigmon
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    Houston | Dallas
    2929 Allen Parkway
    Suite 200
    Houston, Texas 77019
    (P) 832.871.5723
    (M) 214.395.1546
    (F) 713.485.6056
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    NOTICE: This e-mail and/or attachment is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
    and/or legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is
    expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
    copies of the original message.
    From:    Linda Rhymes lrhymes@smith-county.com
    Subject:   RE: 13-3353-A Clerk's Record
    Date:   July 2, 2015 at 3:00 PM
    To:   Ernesto Sigmon esigmon@esigmon.com
    Mr. Sigmon:
    Can you put this on your letter heard and style it as Request for Supplemental Clerk’s Record.
    Thanking you in advance,
    Linda Rhymes
    From: Ernesto Sigmon [mailto:esigmon@esigmon.com]
    Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 2:48 PM
    To: Linda Rhymes
    Cc: stuart starry
    Subject: 13-3353-A Clerk's Record
    Importance: High
    Linda
    We are missing the following items from the record:
    1) “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider its Ruling On Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1
    Rent All’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and Objections to
    Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence with attached exhibits and affidavit from Dr. Samuel
    Barnett” - Appearing on p. 4192 of the record (p. 3 of Plaintiffs’ Clerk Record Request).
    2) "Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to
    Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion
    for Summary Judgment (filed 3/19/15)” - Item 29 of MPF’s cross designation filed June 29th.
    3) 3/17/15 - "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on
    Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment (Texas College)."
    4) 3/17/15 - "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to reopen Summary Judgment
    Record and Request for Leave to Supplement Evidence”
    Items 1,3 and 4 were designated by Plaintiffs but do not appear in the record. Item 2 was
    designated by defendant MPF but does not appear in the record. We would like your guidance on
    the most efficient path to rectifying this situation and creating a full and corrected record as this
    will impact our briefing deadline to the appeals court. Please advise at your earliest. Thank you.
    Ernesto
    ________________________________________________
    Ernesto Sigmon
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    Houston | Dallas
    2929 Allen Parkway
    Suite 200
    Houston, Texas 77019
    (P) 832.871.5723
    (M) 214.395.1546
    (F) 713.485.6056
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    From:    Linda Rhymes lrhymes@smith-county.com
    Subject:   RE: 13-3353-A Clerk's Record
    Date:   July 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM
    To:   Ernesto Sigmon esigmon@esigmon.com
    Mr. Sigmon:
    Is it possible for you to email a copy of the filed stamp copy of what is missing from the record.
    I have checked the physical file. I will address this on Tuesday when I returned to work.
    Thanking you in advance,
    Linda Rhymes
    Appeals Clerk
    903-590-1677
    From: Ernesto Sigmon [mailto:esigmon@esigmon.com]
    Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 2:48 PM
    To: Linda Rhymes
    Cc: stuart starry
    Subject: 13-3353-A Clerk's Record
    Importance: High
    Linda
    We are missing the following items from the record:
    1) “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider its Ruling On Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1
    Rent All’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and Objections to
    Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence with attached exhibits and affidavit from Dr. Samuel
    Barnett” - Appearing on p. 4192 of the record (p. 3 of Plaintiffs’ Clerk Record Request).
    2) "Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to
    Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion
    for Summary Judgment (filed 3/19/15)” - Item 29 of MPF’s cross designation filed June 29th.
    3) 3/17/15 - "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on
    Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment (Texas College)."
    4) 3/17/15 - "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to reopen Summary Judgment
    Record and Request for Leave to Supplement Evidence”
    Items 1,3 and 4 were designated by Plaintiffs but do not appear in the record. Item 2 was
    designated by defendant MPF but does not appear in the record. We would like your guidance on
    the most efficient path to rectifying this situation and creating a full and corrected record as this
    will impact our briefing deadline to the appeals court. Please advise at your earliest. Thank you.
    Ernesto
    ________________________________________________
    Ernesto Sigmon
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    Houston | Dallas
    2929 Allen Parkway
    Suite 200
    Houston, Texas 77019
    (P) 832.871.5723
    (M) 214.395.1546
    (F) 713.485.6056
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    From:    Ernesto Sigmon esigmon@esigmon.com
    Subject:   Re: 13-3353-A Clerk's Record
    Date:   July 2, 2015 at 6:07 PM
    To:   Linda Rhymes lrhymes@smith-county.com
    Cc:    stuart starry stuart@starrylaw.com
    Hi Linda
    Absolutely. Please see the attached request correspondence and supporting files. Thanks for all your help and have an enjoyable 4th.
    Best,
    Ernesto
    Clerk Letter Request
    (Supp) 7.2.15
    3:17 Orders.pdf
    ________________________________________________
    Ernesto Sigmon
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    Houston | Dallas
    2929 Allen Parkway
    Suite 200
    Houston, Texas 77019
    (P) 832.871.5723
    (M) 214.395.1546
    (F) 713.485.6056
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    NOTICE: This e-mail and/or attachment is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
    and/or legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this communication is
    expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
    copies of the original message.
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    EXHIBIT!D!
    !
    !
    !
    ACCEPTED
    12-15-00121-CV
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    6/29/2015 5:13:54 PM
    CATHY LUSK
    CLERK
    CAUSE NO. 13-3353-A
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND                                  §                 IN THE DISTRICT COURT
    CARLA D. ROLLINS,                                     §
    §
    Plaintiffs,                                      §
    §
    v.                                                    §                 SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
    §
    TEXAS COLLEGE, CHRISTIAN                              §
    METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH                            §
    AND MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC                              §
    D/B/A “A-1 RENT ALL”,                                 §
    §
    Defendants.                                      §                 7TH DISTRICT COURT
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S
    CROSS-DESIGNATION OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    In addition to the items Plaintiffs and Texas College have designated, Defendant MPF
    Investments, LLC d/b/a A-1 Rent All requests that the clerk’s record on appeal from this cause
    would include the following additional items:
    1)        First Amended Plaintiffs’ Original Petition (filed 1/21/14).
    2)        Original Answer (filed 5/27/14).
    3)        Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible
    Third Party (filed 8/12/14).
    4)        Plaintiffs’ Objection to Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion for Leave to
    Designate Responsible Third Party (filed 8/25/14).
    5)        Order Granting Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion for Leave to
    Designate Responsible Third Party (signed 9/2/14).
    6)        MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to Written
    Discovery and Brief in Support with all attachments (filed 10/1/14).
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                                  Page 1
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    7)      Plaintiffs’ Motion to
    Strike MPF Investments, LLC’s Designation of Responsible Third Party (filed 10/8/14).
    8)      Order on MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to
    Written Discovery (signed 10/27/14).
    9)      Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike MPF Investments, LLC’s Designation
    of Responsible Third Party (signed 10/27/14).
    10)     Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike
    Responsible Third Party (filed 10/23/14).
    11)     Amended Answer (filed 11/13/14).
    12)     Supplemental Answer (filed 11/17/14).
    13)     Order Granting Summary Judgment (signed 12/9/14).
    14)     Motion for Severance (filed 12/15/14).
    15)     Agreed Motion (filed 12/30/14).
    16)     Severance (filed 1/6/15).
    17)     Order (signed 1/6/15).
    18)     MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion to Enforce Court Order on Written Discovery
    and for Sanctions with all attachments (filed 1/26/15).
    19)     Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All and Texas College’s
    Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales, and Thomas M.
    Roney (filed 1/26/15).
    20)     Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A “A-1 Rent All”
    and Texas College’s Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales,
    and Thomas M. Roney (filed 2/3/15).
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                                Page 2
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    21)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All and Texas College’s
    Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion to Strike Retained Experts Martinez, Gonzales, and
    Roney (filed 2/6/15).
    22)    Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Reply Regarding Defendant MPF Investments,
    LLC D/B/A “A-1 Rent All” and Texas College’s Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert
    Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales, and Thomas M. Roney (filed 2/9/15).
    23)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A “A-1 Rent All”’s Second Amended
    Answer (filed 2/10/15).
    24)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion to
    Enforce Court Order on Written Discovery and for Sanctions with attachments (filed 2/13/15).
    25)    MPF Investments, LLC’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Traditional and No-
    Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment
    Evidence with attachments (filed 2/13/15).
    26)    Response (filed 2/10/15).
    27)    Order on Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All and Texas
    College’s Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales, and
    Thomas M. Roney (signed 2/19/15).
    28)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’
    Emergency Motion to Reopen Summary Judgment Record and Request for Leave to Supplement
    Evidence with attachments. (filed 3/12/15).
    29)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion
    to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion for
    Summary Judgment (filed 3/19/15).
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                                 Page 3
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    30)    A bill of costs.
    Respectfully submitted,
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON & WISDOM, L.L.P.
    By: /s/ Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Texas Bar No. 10059825
    hovnatanian@mdjwlaw.com
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    By: /s/ Todd M. Lonergan
    Todd M. Lonergan
    Texas Bar No. 12513700
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    By: /s/ Ryan K. Geddie
    Ryan K. Geddie
    Texas Bar No. 24055541
    geddie@mdjwlaw.com
    Tollway Plaza One
    16000 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 800
    Dallas, Texas 75248
    (214) 420-5500 – Telephone
    (214) 420-5501 – Facsimile
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A "A-1 RENT ALL"
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                          Page 4
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing MPF
    Investments, LLC’s Cross-Designation of Items for Clerk’s Record has been forwarded to the
    individuals listed below, by the methods indicated, on this 29th day of June, 2015.
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    WALKER SIGMON
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    (via e-filing and e-mail at esigmon@esigmon.com)
    (Attorney for appellants Garry L. Rollins and Carla D. Rollins)
    Trey Yarbrough
    YARBROUGH WILCOX GUNTER, PLLC
    100 East Ferguson, Suite 1015
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    (via e-filing and e-mail at Trey@yw-lawfirm.com)
    (Attorney for appellee Texas College)
    Ms. Lois Rogers, District Clerk
    SMITH COUNTY
    100 N. Broadway Avenue
    Tyler, TX 75202
    (via e-filing and U.S. Mail)
    Ms. Cathy Lusk, Clerk
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    1517 West Front Street
    Suite 354
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    (via e-filing)
    /s/ Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Levon G. Hovnatanian
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                            Page 5
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    Exhibit  “B”
    FILE COPY
    CHIEF JUSTICE                                                                                                                   CLERK
    JAMES T. WORTHEN                                                                                                                CATHY S. LUSK
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    JUSTICES                                                                                                                        CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY
    BRIAN HOYLE                                                                                                                     MARGARET HUSSEY
    GREG NEELEY
    July 8, 2015
    Mr. Ernesto Sigmon                                                          Mr. Gregory D. Smith
    Walker Sigmon                                                               Ramey & Flock, PC
    416 W. Saulnier Street                                                      100 East Ferguson
    Houston, TX 77019                                                           Suite 500
    * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *                                                    Tyler, TX 75702
    * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
    Mr. Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Martin, Disiere & Jefferson & Wisdom, LLP
    808 Travis, Suite 1800
    Houston, TX 77002
    * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
    RE:        Case Number:                            12-15-00121-CV
    Trial Court Case Number:                13-3353-A
    Style: Garry L. Rollins and Carla D. Rollins
    v.
    Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC d/b/a "A-1 Rent All"
    You are hereby notified that in the above-described case, the following decision and order was
    this day made and entered by this Court:
    "THIS DAY came on to be considered Appellants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief
    herein; and the same being inspected, it is ORDERED that said motion be, and hereby is,
    GRANTED, and that the time for filing the Appellants’ brief be extended to and including
    August 10, 2015."
    Very truly yours,
    CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK
    By:_____________________________
    Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
    1517 WEST FRONT STREET • SUITE 354 • TYLER, TX 75702 • TEL: 903-593-8471 • FAX: 903-593-2193
    Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van
    Zandt and Wood Counties
    http://www.txcourts.gov/12thcoa.aspx
    FILE COPY
    1517 WEST FRONT STREET • SUITE 354 • TYLER, TX 75702 • TEL: 903-593-8471 • FAX: 903-593-2193
    Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith,
    Trinity, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood Counties
    http://www.txcourts.gov/12thcoa.aspx
    Exhibit  “C”
    TRIAL COURT OFFICIAL’S
    REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RECORD
    Fax to Cathy S. Lusk, 12th Court of Appeals, Tyler, TX. Fax # (903) 593-2193
    FILED  IN
    Court of Appeals No. (If Known): 12-15-00121-CV                             12th  COURT  OF  APPEALS
    TYLER,  TEXAS
    Trial Court Style: GARRY L. ROLLINS AND CARLA D. ROLLINS VS                TEXAS
    7/22/2015  9:49:01  AM  COLLEGE AND
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A “A-1 RENT ALL”                                                   CATHY  S.  LUSK
    Clerk
    Trial Court & County:       7TH
    Trial Court No.:      13-3353-A
    Date Trial Clerk’s Record Originally Due:        06/22/2015
    Date Court Reporter’s/Recorder’s Record Originally Due:
    Anticipated Number of Pages of Record:       29 VOLUMES
    I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original
    due date for the following reason(s): (check all that apply – attach additional pages if necessary)
    To the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to
    either pay the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record.
    My duties listed below preclude working on this record:
    x      Other, (Explain) : DUE TO UNFORSEEN REASONS, I HAVE BEEN OUT AND UNABLE TO COMPLETE THE RECORD.
    I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12th Court of Appeals by 08-30-2015,
    And I hereby request an additional 45 days within which to prepare the record.
    TEX.R.APP.P.37.3.
    In compliance with TEX.R.APP.P.9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel
    for all parties to the Trial Court’s judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by my signature
    below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge.
    Date: 05-12-15                                    /S/ LINDA RHYMES
    /S/ LINDA RHYMES
    Office Phone Number:        903-590-1772                LINDA RHYMES
    (Printed Name)
    APPEALS CLERK
    (Official Title)
    TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.5(e) reads:
    Certificate requirements: A certificate of service must be signed by the person who made
    the service and must state:
    (1) the date and manner of service;
    (2) the name and address of each person served; and
    (3) if the person served is a party’s attorney, the name of the party represented by that
    attorney.
    The following parties have been served with a copy of this document:
    Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S):                        Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S):
    Name:            ERNESTO SIGMON.                      Name:            MR. TREY YARBROUGH
    Address:         SIGMON LAW, PLLC                     Address:         YARBROUGH WILCOX, PLLC
    2929 ALLEN PARKWAY                                    100 E. FERGUSON, STE. 1015
    HOUSTON, TEXAS 77019                                  TYLER, TEXAS 75702
    Phone #:         832.871.5723                         Phone #:         903.595.3111 FAX 903.595.0191
    214.395.1546
    Attorney For:    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND                 Attorney For:    TEXAS COLLEGE
    CARLA ROLLINS
    Name:            RYAN K. GEDDIE
    MARTIN, DISIERE,
    JEFFERSON & WISDOM, LLP
    TOLLWAY PLAZA ONE
    16000 N. DALLAS PARKWAY,
    SUITE. 800
    DALLAS, TEXAS 75248
    Phone #:        214.420.5500 FAX 214.420.5501
    Attorney For:    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A
    “A1-RENT ALL”
    Exhibit  “D”
    FILE COPY
    CHIEF JUSTICE                                                                                                                   CLERK
    JAMES T. WORTHEN                                                                                                                CATHY S. LUSK
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    JUSTICES                                                                                                                        CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY
    BRIAN HOYLE                                                                                                                     MARGARET HUSSEY
    GREG NEELEY
    July 30, 2015
    Ms. Lois Rogers
    District Clerk, Smith County
    Courthouse, Suite 204
    100 North Broadway Avenue
    Tyler, TX 75702-7201
    * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
    RE:        Case Number:                            12-15-00121-CV
    Trial Court Case Number:                13-3353-A
    Style: Garry L. Rollins and Carla D. Rollins
    v.
    Texas College and MPF Investments, LLC d/b/a "A-1 Rent All"
    You are hereby notified that in the above-described case, the following decision and order was
    this day made and entered by this Court:
    "THIS DAY came on to be considered the Clerk's Request for Extension of Time to File the
    Corrected Record herein; and the same being inspected, it is ORDERED that said request be,
    and hereby is, GRANTED, and the time for filing the corrected clerk's record be extended to and
    including August 31, 2015."
    Very truly yours,
    CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK
    By:_____________________________
    Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
    CC:         Mr. Ernesto Sigmon (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
    Mr. Gregory D. Smith (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
    Mr. Levon G. Hovnatanian (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
    1517 WEST FRONT STREET • SUITE 354 • TYLER, TX 75702 • TEL: 903-593-8471 • FAX: 903-593-2193
    Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van
    Zandt and Wood Counties
    http://www.txcourts.gov/12thcoa.aspx
    Exhibit  “E”
    SIGMON LAW, PLLC
    2929 Allen Parkway - Suite 200
    Houston, TX 77019
    (Tel) 214.395.1546 · (Fax) 713.485.6056
    esigmon@esigmon.com
    July 2, 2015
    VIA EMAIL
    Linda Rhymes
    Smith County District Clerk - Appeals
    100 North Broadway
    Room 204
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    Re:            Formal Request to Supplement the Clerk’s Record in Gary L. Rollins and Carla
    D. Rollins v. Texas College et. al., in the 7th Judicial District of Smith, County
    Texas.
    Dear Ms. Rhymes:
    On May 8th, 2015 our office filed a request for mandatory items to be included in the Clerk’s
    record of this matter. We recently discovered that the following items are missing from the
    record:
    1) “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider its Ruling On Defendant MPF
    Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All’s Traditional and No Evidence
    Motion for Summary Judgment and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Summary
    Judgment Evidence” (with attached exhibits and affidavit from Dr. Samuel
    Barnett)
    2) "Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to
    Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s
    Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion for Summary Judgment”
    3) "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on
    Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment
    (Texas College)"
    4) "Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to reopen Summary
    Judgment Record and Request for Leave to Supplement Evidence”
    Item #1 was electronically filed on March 2, 2015. While I did not save a file stamped copy of
    the lead document once accepted, I am including a screen shot of the accepted submission for
    ease of reference (unfortunately the links to the actual documents have expired). Please note that
    the exhibits to the motion are also listed below:
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    Counsel Geddie Ltr 8.12.14
    Ms. Linda Rhymes
    July 2, 2015
    Page 2 of 3
    Item #2 was cross-designated by defendant MPF on June 29, 2015 but does not appear in the
    record.
    Items #3 and #4 are attached for reference as requested (filed stamped photocopies taken from
    our file).
    Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5, this correspondence serves as a formal
    request that you prepare, certify and file in the appellate court a supplement containing the
    omitted items referenced above.
    We greatly appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate if you have any
    questions or concerns. Thank you in advance.
    Sincerely,
    /s/Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    Sigmon Law, PLLC
    2929 Allen Parkway
    Suite 200
    Houston, TX 77019
    Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellants
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    Clerk Ltr 7.2.15
    Exhibit  “F”
    ACCEPTED
    12-15-00121-CV
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    6/29/2015 5:13:54 PM
    CATHY LUSK
    CLERK
    CAUSE NO. 13-3353-A
    GARRY L. ROLLINS AND                                  §                 IN THE DISTRICT COURT
    CARLA D. ROLLINS,                                     §
    §
    Plaintiffs,                                      §
    §
    v.                                                    §                 SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
    §
    TEXAS COLLEGE, CHRISTIAN                              §
    METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH                            §
    AND MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC                              §
    D/B/A “A-1 RENT ALL”,                                 §
    §
    Defendants.                                      §                 7TH DISTRICT COURT
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S
    CROSS-DESIGNATION OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    In addition to the items Plaintiffs and Texas College have designated, Defendant MPF
    Investments, LLC d/b/a A-1 Rent All requests that the clerk’s record on appeal from this cause
    would include the following additional items:
    1)        First Amended Plaintiffs’ Original Petition (filed 1/21/14).
    2)        Original Answer (filed 5/27/14).
    3)        Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible
    Third Party (filed 8/12/14).
    4)        Plaintiffs’ Objection to Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion for Leave to
    Designate Responsible Third Party (filed 8/25/14).
    5)        Order Granting Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion for Leave to
    Designate Responsible Third Party (signed 9/2/14).
    6)        MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to Written
    Discovery and Brief in Support with all attachments (filed 10/1/14).
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                                  Page 1
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    7)      Plaintiffs’ Motion to
    Strike MPF Investments, LLC’s Designation of Responsible Third Party (filed 10/8/14).
    8)      Order on MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to
    Written Discovery (signed 10/27/14).
    9)      Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike MPF Investments, LLC’s Designation
    of Responsible Third Party (signed 10/27/14).
    10)     Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike
    Responsible Third Party (filed 10/23/14).
    11)     Amended Answer (filed 11/13/14).
    12)     Supplemental Answer (filed 11/17/14).
    13)     Order Granting Summary Judgment (signed 12/9/14).
    14)     Motion for Severance (filed 12/15/14).
    15)     Agreed Motion (filed 12/30/14).
    16)     Severance (filed 1/6/15).
    17)     Order (signed 1/6/15).
    18)     MPF Investments, LLC’s Motion to Enforce Court Order on Written Discovery
    and for Sanctions with all attachments (filed 1/26/15).
    19)     Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All and Texas College’s
    Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales, and Thomas M.
    Roney (filed 1/26/15).
    20)     Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A “A-1 Rent All”
    and Texas College’s Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales,
    and Thomas M. Roney (filed 2/3/15).
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                                Page 2
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    21)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All and Texas College’s
    Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion to Strike Retained Experts Martinez, Gonzales, and
    Roney (filed 2/6/15).
    22)    Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Reply Regarding Defendant MPF Investments,
    LLC D/B/A “A-1 Rent All” and Texas College’s Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert
    Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales, and Thomas M. Roney (filed 2/9/15).
    23)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A “A-1 Rent All”’s Second Amended
    Answer (filed 2/10/15).
    24)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion to
    Enforce Court Order on Written Discovery and for Sanctions with attachments (filed 2/13/15).
    25)    MPF Investments, LLC’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Traditional and No-
    Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment
    Evidence with attachments (filed 2/13/15).
    26)    Response (filed 2/10/15).
    27)    Order on Defendant MPF Investments, LLC D/B/A A-1 Rent All and Texas
    College’s Motion to Strike Expert Designations of Gilbert Martinez, Joe G. Gonzales, and
    Thomas M. Roney (signed 2/19/15).
    28)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’
    Emergency Motion to Reopen Summary Judgment Record and Request for Leave to Supplement
    Evidence with attachments. (filed 3/12/15).
    29)    Defendant MPF Investments, LLC’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion
    to Reconsider the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion for
    Summary Judgment (filed 3/19/15).
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                                 Page 3
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    30)    A bill of costs.
    Respectfully submitted,
    MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON & WISDOM, L.L.P.
    By: /s/ Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Texas Bar No. 10059825
    hovnatanian@mdjwlaw.com
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    By: /s/ Todd M. Lonergan
    Todd M. Lonergan
    Texas Bar No. 12513700
    lonergan@mdjwlaw.com
    808 Travis, 20th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 632-1700 – Telephone
    (713) 222-0101 – Facsimile
    By: /s/ Ryan K. Geddie
    Ryan K. Geddie
    Texas Bar No. 24055541
    geddie@mdjwlaw.com
    Tollway Plaza One
    16000 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 800
    Dallas, Texas 75248
    (214) 420-5500 – Telephone
    (214) 420-5501 – Facsimile
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A "A-1 RENT ALL"
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                          Page 4
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing MPF
    Investments, LLC’s Cross-Designation of Items for Clerk’s Record has been forwarded to the
    individuals listed below, by the methods indicated, on this 29th day of June, 2015.
    Ernesto D. Sigmon
    WALKER SIGMON
    416 West Saulnier Street
    Houston, Texas 77019
    (via e-filing and e-mail at esigmon@esigmon.com)
    (Attorney for appellants Garry L. Rollins and Carla D. Rollins)
    Trey Yarbrough
    YARBROUGH WILCOX GUNTER, PLLC
    100 East Ferguson, Suite 1015
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    (via e-filing and e-mail at Trey@yw-lawfirm.com)
    (Attorney for appellee Texas College)
    Ms. Lois Rogers, District Clerk
    SMITH COUNTY
    100 N. Broadway Avenue
    Tyler, TX 75202
    (via e-filing and U.S. Mail)
    Ms. Cathy Lusk, Clerk
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    1517 West Front Street
    Suite 354
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    (via e-filing)
    /s/ Levon G. Hovnatanian
    Levon G. Hovnatanian
    MPF INVESTMENTS, LLC’S CROSS-DESIGNATION                                            Page 5
    OF ITEMS FOR CLERK’S RECORD
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-15-00121-CV

Filed Date: 7/31/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016