Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick" ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                       PD-1067-15
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Transmitted 9/17/2015 3:24:37 PM
    September 17, 2015                                                    Accepted 9/17/2015 3:55:07 PM
    ABEL ACOSTA
    NO. PD-1067-15                                                CLERK
    IN THE
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
    EX PARTE JAMES RICHARD “RICK” PERRY,
    Appellant
    STATE’S MOTION TO STAY TRIAL COURT
    PROCEEDINGS
    To the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals:
    The State of Texas files this Motion to Stay Trial Court Proceedings
    Pending Appeal. In support of this motion, the State shows the following:
    The Grand Jury indicted Defendant on two counts:
    (1) Abuse of Official Capacity Statute, or TEX. PENAL CODE §
    39.02(a)(2), which makes it an offense for a “public servant,”
    “with intent to harm . . . another,” to intentionally or knowingly
    “misuse government property . . . that has come into the pubic
    servant’s custody or possession by virtue of the public servant’s
    office or employment;
    (2) Coercion of Public Servant, or TEX. PENAL CODE § 36.03(a)(1)
    which makes it an offense for a person, “by means of coercion,”
    to “influence” or attempt to “influence” a “public servant” to a
    specific end.
    To date, the prosecution has proceeded under one indictment with one
    cause number and for resolution by one trial. Although the Third Court of
    Appeals rejected Appellant’s legal arguments to dismiss Count I, he is
    seeking a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal
    Appeals. And because the Third Court of Appeals invalidated a public law
    that protects all citizens from public corruption, the State Prosecutor’s Office
    is seeking discretionary review regarding the statute at issue in Count Two.
    It is unknown whether this Court will grant review on either or both
    grounds. The State’s interests in seeking this stay are threefold: 1) to defend
    a statute passed by the Texas Legislature specifically to protect the public
    from abuse of power by public officials; 2) to avoid duplicitous legal
    proceedings; and 3) to resolve this case by one public trial. The State asks
    for this Court to issue an Order staying the proceedings in trial court so all
    matters can be resolved in this Court before proceeding with piecemeal
    litigation. This Court has the authority to grant a stay of proceedings in the
    trial court. See, e.g., In re Schulman, 2007 Tex. Crim. App. Unpub. LEXIS
    1271, *1 (Tex. Crim. App. June 8, 2007) (granting motion to stay); In re
    Allen, 2014 Tex. Crim. App. Unpub. LEXIS 972, *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct.
    30, 2014) (“We have before us . . . a motion for a temporary stay in the
    proceedings below. The motion for a temporary stay is granted and these
    cases are ordered filed and set.”); State ex rel. Hill v. Pirtle, 
    887 S.W.2d 921
    ,
    925 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (“On January 29, 1993, relator asked this Court
    for a stay of all proceedings in the criminal prosecutions and a writ of
    mandamus ordering respondent to vacate his order granting the motions to
    prohibit. See TEX.R.APP.PROC. 211. On February 5, 1993, this Court
    stayed the proceedings in the trial court and ordered this case filed and set
    for submission.”); Ex parte Reposa, 2008 Tex. Crim. App. Unpub. LEXIS
    496, *1 (Tex. Crim. App. July 2, 2008) (“The stay of proceedings previously
    entered in this case is continued.”); In re Bowen, 2011 Tex. Crim. App.
    Unpub. LEXIS 448, *2 (Tex. Crim. App. May 27, 2011) (“The Respondent,
    the Judge of the 368th District Court of Williamson County, is directed to
    stay the proceedings”); In re Solis-Gonzalez, 2015 Tex. Crim. App. Unpub.
    LEXIS 118, *2 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 9, 2015) (“the trial proceedings below
    are stayed pending further order of this Court”).
    Respectfully Submitted:
    MICHAEL MCCRUM
    State Bar No. 13493200
    District Attorney Pro Tem
    Travis County, Texas
    700 N. St. Mary’s St., Suite 1900
    San Antonio, TX 78205
    Telephone: (210) 225-2285
    Facsimile: (210) 225-7045
    michael@mccrumlegal.com
    By:   /s/ David M. Gonzalez
    DAVID M. GONZALEZ
    State Bar No. 24012711
    Assistant District Attorney Pro Tem
    Travis County, Texas
    206 East 9th Street, Suite 1511
    Austin, Texas 78701
    Telephone: (512) 381-9955
    Facsimile: (512) 485-3121
    david@sg-llp.com
    ATTORNEYS FOR
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    This is to certify that on September 17, 2015 a true and correct copy of
    this the State’s Motion to Stay Trial Proceedings has been emailed to:
    Lisa McMinn
    Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney
    P.O.Box 13046
    Austin, TX 78711
    Lisa.mcminn@spa.texas.gov
    David L. Botsford
    Botsford & Roark
    1307 West Ave.
    Austin, TX 78701
    (512) 479-8040 Facsimile
    dbotsford@aol.com
    Thomas R. Phillips
    Baker Botts, L.L.P.
    98 San Jacinto Blvd., Ste. 1500
    Austin, TX 78701
    (512) 322-8363 Facsimile
    Tom.phillips@bakerbotts.com
    Anthony G. Buzbee
    The Buzbee Law Firm
    600 Travis St., Ste. 7300
    Houston, TX 77002
    (713) 223-5909 Facsimile
    tbuzbee@txattorneys.com
    /s/ David M. Gonzalez
    David Gonzalez
    

Document Info

Docket Number: PD-1067-15

Filed Date: 9/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016