Emerson Buckley, Jr. v. State ( 2006 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 16, 2006

    Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 16, 2006.

     

     

    In The

     

    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

    ____________

     

    NO. 14-06-00886-CR

    ____________

     

    EMERSON BUCKLEY, JR., Appellant

     

    V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

      

     

    On Appeal from the 185th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 1033578

     

      

     

    M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

    Appellant entered a plea of guilty to possession of less that one gram of cocaine.  On September 7, 2005, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for two years in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, probated for two years.  On September 20, 2006, the trial court signed an order amending the conditions of appellant=s community supervision.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on September 25, 2006.


    An order modifying probation is not a separately appealable order.  See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Christopher v. State, 7 S.W.3d 224, 225 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. ref=d)..  Complaints about a modification order may be raised on appeal only when violation of the modified order forms the basis of a subsequent revocation.  See Elizondo v. State, 966 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1998, no pet.). 

    This court=s jurisdiction is invoked when a defendant files a notice of appeal from a judgment or other appealable order within 30 days after sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the trial court enters an appealable order.  Appellant=s notice of appeal, filed more than one year after sentence was imposed, is untimely to appeal from the judgment of conviction.  Because the trial court=s September 20, 2006, order merely modified the conditions of appellant=s probation and did not revoke his probation, the order is not appealable and we have no jurisdiction.

    Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

     

    PER CURIAM

     

    Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 16, 2006.

    Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Seymore.

    Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-06-00886-CR

Filed Date: 11/16/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021