Nettles, Shane Matthew ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • 53, 151 '@'
    WRIT NO. WO9-00208-P(A)
    Ex PARTE § IN THE coURT oF cRIMINAL APPEALS
    § ,
    §
    §
    §
    SHANE MATTHEw NETTLES § TRAVIS coUNTY,TEXAS
    APPLICANTS REBUTTAL TQ STATESHREBBUNSE
    lhe applicant,having considered the States respones,and general
    denial, make the following written rebuttal,
    3 l §PPL;CANT'S REBUTTAL
    The applicant would like to address States allegation's at this
    time.State claims applicantahas not provided Sufficient proof to
    merit consideration of applicant's claims.l understand the burden
    of proof is on myself being the applicant§l have done my best as
    a layman at law to draw up the grounds and write the memoranumc
    of law.As far as providing§legal documents,my hands are somewhat
    tied.Tex.Gov't Code Ann.§552.028 gives county jails,T.D.C.J.
    ,and Board of Pardens and Parole the right to deny those records
    l feel may becneeded topprovide extra proof.Furthermore the State
    makes claims that applicant challenge to H.B.1433 was specifically
    addressed in(see Geiken,28 S.W. 3d at;557).ln the case named by the
    State Geiken's claim was against Judicial review of the boards
    decision and applicant¥s is not.applicant'saclaim is against how
    H.B.1433 came into effect and the procedural process used to deny
    'as a whole.ln (Teague v. Quarterman 
    482 F.3d 769
    )(Sth Cir.2007)
    at 776 they state parole has a narrowly limited modicum of discretion
    .lt is also stated in S.B.213 that parole tell applicant inrwritting
    specifically how and why they came to the decision.ln more then one
    point in law parolewhas violated my rights concerning the procedural
    process and continue to abuse thier discretion.ln Teague v. '
    Quarterman 
    482 F.3d 769
    the 5th circuit also states Texas inmates
    have a contitional expectancy of early release.When the Board of
    pardens and Parole took that date,they violate State and Federal
    Constitutional Law.
    PRAYER FOR RELIEF
    Applicant Shane Matthew Nettles.pro'se,resectfully request the
    Court to forgive applicant for being a layman at law.Applicant
    humbly ask the Court to grant applicants application for WRIT
    of Habeas Corpus and make findings for relief on the five grounds
    in the application. »
    Respectfully Submitted
    %@M
    §hane Nettles #1566038
    Movant Pro'Se
    c/c
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-83,151-01

Filed Date: 5/1/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016