David James Chapman v. State ( 2015 )

Dew 1a Cofa$> CWa^fvoA X
tov/ft oflwrnb Qcuot/
-. TgXO^
^fencb.nt^;;!" in fimlra.
\b~Tir& HonofaGieTuioe, of 8&Td CoufS-:
Coffl?S onuh fb^r} HarQgS C-hg^rmg Qeftytfaft
£pg^ Tn?) Orfrlrm rO honing. anfi-^Ccy^
£btj?y, mows nndv,:9n->sR -fors cojPHd
.State Of igXQfvQH ftF J-H2. Sfc^eS (ATftflBSpS,
to re-Hetin-Wcm rryrnan-nq •or rxgaPSStYnQ
fo -hoe. Uteres vtoirrfifo on-ft/or offihtor
Stovhgmgms "fe tn£?ifxv 6v 6cestinn^iiTu^r
-feviovo^QQ -facts g^T"^F
71 Arty fejCdcJt of y>nbr Cfi^npyl ArCP^T MovCh
Sfa M ^re defe^nt -Mer CoS^ holaJ oemlro ooTnRtk FILEBriN
"hog, r^fendo/rV 1ST COURT OF APPEALS
HOUSTON. IbXAS
JUN -S2°15
"0P/T/jfT
CHHISTQPHjR
CLERK
LN
presence
H Th^gxrstQPoeDFoiny rteoffi c3n£i£ifaffr-
ivfcfeQCft TnCKdJm any rtgnS -firm-fae
OlietfH Car (y^hTCK ^f&ndonj- alleged
Af custody iTS Qsdfe|UQl€\y estebi^vfe-i
zs he Stq^mzov 6y -fne pfo^qjfAp tefrsa
C& 6toaJ5e^TH ij^ytR .CcgfE^
pca^flirtvhn in
.. . i ... — -- . ,.. - . • -.,,... - - Jafftfrtfj
Tip, [eeufton ;WffiCsV o>v^x>CV">€