Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary, and City of Houston v. David B. Wilson ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                   COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:       Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary, and City of
    Houston v. David B. Wilson
    Appellate case number:     01-15-00687-CV
    Trial court case number: 2015-39706
    Trial court:               270th District Court of Harris
    Appellee, David B. Wilson, has filed an “Emergency Motion to Dismiss, and
    Alternatively, to Refer Enforcement of Mandamus to Trial Court.” The motion is DENIED.
    On August 7, 2015, appellants, Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary,
    and City of Houston, filed a notice of interlocutory appeal of a July 28, 2015 trial court order that
    grants appellee David B. Wilson’s “Application for Writ of Mandamus” and orders the City
    Secretary to “count and certify to the Houston City Council the number of valid signatures
    contained in the petition submitted by [Wilson] . . . .” This Court generally has jurisdiction only
    over appeals from final judgments unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal. See CMH
    Homes v. Perez, 
    340 S.W.3d 444
    , 447–48 (Tex. 2011); Paulsen v. Yarrell, 
    455 S.W.3d 192
    , 195
    (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.) (citing Rusk State Hosp. v. Black, 
    392 S.W.3d 88
    ,
    92 (Tex. 2012)); see also, e.g., TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West 2015)
    (authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders).
    Accordingly, appellants are hereby notified that the Court may dismiss this appeal for
    want of jurisdiction unless appellants file a written response to this notice, providing a detailed
    explanation, citing relevant portions of the record, statutes, rules, and case law to show that this
    Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Any response must be filed
    within 10 days of the date of this notice. You must respond in writing even if you have
    previously claimed that this Court has jurisdiction over your appeal.
    If a meritorious response is not received in the form described above by the deadline, the
    Court may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction without further notice.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd
    Date: August 19, 2015
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00687-CV

Filed Date: 8/19/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015