Ford, David Eugene ( 2015 )

^ pra$£ p,o* (S
, 6}UrV C-f- CnY>\inou| flppgJs
Ifee^W oKfato? [9,-^-0050 ^rR
AheM_
vL
ikmikr^o^j"
M^" Floor )r?Mi khudae jOt) tit 9to\VcMKlVtg^
Ail
* nfadtyyrveAJ?
9v
^
•hst.w
id
~lMwrt\W Tlargc! •J> fftufefcOcA* gm R»
• 4:H
n^mnm-/-'
lL)i6
J^peAto, 15»\W
Aab\e o£ AuVhnriVieS W»M E^
Cose?>
"\aX^tsMh\^3M FSup^S5SLga a
rJBsbda-uiUxeo" Sv
to
£4h\m^-CQd£&ti^is^m^ 5x
-£k yart-e. Am"iti-^ 33*>/SW>5D 36~5t>^:
5
^bk
"6i/Q|fe \j. U-5, ,Me>5 u-5/ I5c>f/fi?,^ ^,#^,76^,0^ i
51 lt2A,9A [CMfarti)
4
a
jJ^lb^JUi^
1l
" i-OZanQ i/. to^anoi^ 3UA 5DM/
a.
-fYli'fcW v/,5-fate 76^j SW^D%
nqtoft .
i
'Pembroke v', \j\)ocA CbtmV-j >\g'xelD bHi CfV\flb R)ftD 5e£.k5 Vo appeal V\\'^ cftavrtcKan avvi^eavence. £oe Vwe o ^.nsg^
^.tS-QcfeexiSc (A SppVfjr^h^r d^ ftOl^ cnU a^Ver ^aVeriao^ g .f>l«.a oV- o^'\IK| \' proczedqA Vq Vtto,I \>-\ Saury \w Vh« i\4^-fNT^Vtrcf Coivf o£•
SmiVh OouA.k/lleAa45«>Xn ^Vembera£ 3oi^ 00r, fori mcus rotateteer~ t^QBanc1
fiWbmiAV o^ fivQCPAar^\ lu £bc &,Vgjn?>ron p£ Tcme, Vo Qile moUor>
VVme Vo ftie morion W ceWoinrt^ uoaa ovjgj-ailed Olt3.Go^e.Qu-gAV^iy fto moHon $6c t^Ja-cxm-tv^ ujcjjo £tl€.r(H^) gToaAA.t) £or fto>Ceu*
(nrouM For (Vjuscuj /V7ui/\akec Qfyg.YlT):11
- \V\gL CcxicV o£ Att**As £rted t\Ts W\lCn^Jta^V„<"
Ground For fWioc? f\)umW.r liiao fcC) 1frrrora \<\ Voir Du
- \\\£. rouu\ o-£ Appeals m WaUtn^ VvuiV Wvirt. jjqojj no errors in vdfrOfre*.
"_G\fCXJufVL for Vo Vie *xia\ucOreA u\r\\gr VW sWAaU e.v\u£(flbel \»n S^cVclarvl w
\NJ05V\^W^ HioU U,^ u\d% xto^S.cV, v^/b^S L.&A-?>P ^HH/l^cilsg
\W^r \\") \yca)t Coameto per£oiw\ar\ce: &g_lV NoeWj oof\ O^g-cV^e. sVo^Agutl of
\oVod\K(« AlMnoufo do one vrtbVance oW^ fA\o>ne. fy\cv^ W gUL&Cefe/U.
fflelvjft\ Tv^wNp^on yjoa'c) AekcCefyV ru\A ^a\VeX "To
Qpfi\e. a moHon To t3w press fjo^g/vfe ^_
^Ag^ ax\k. o^c^e. %aV w\<\ forA. isseo ftoV Yhg pg;pcA>rator vxAqp cotobei. \^i\o,(oc\^i
P(rrfrS
CjO^Wyttft \$ vftWuCfeUjeA oogV^ VesVc^ \a QoxH g<\A WxrcoJdle
^vjuQ^oCV ck. row^CcVco^ „ : .
ft?) fciW. Vn XNMcfiHojfx,W». and Qr^covef fijuUncg ffi^ryirV^ _
fcmeiLauXfra _ffi3StW »^Q^ ^.^(flU qfeme^ rejpexnh'n^ axrftwW
10^x*/i^ojA3_jo\_svy1ISO.jon°, % ^rh» lA/e^m.,,
HIS aw ^n^ai,^ lex tc;rt-r.tPP.^clQ^.(^n ecooomrc AecfofaT) Vo
r>oA- %UA\s{ ^ug^Vt^aJy^ r^ nei\ber qLoVrdde^Ce nor rgggonaJplg. clecteft*y
W CVO v„uVh Wxl lAaACrj fieaprAed afoHmi/iVS a£ kflorla CocVe.5
Igfog. Q\fO i63AV*oV- flfcXrasfr \M\Vfla5 (KV^05)-6^QHiaQ 0 "noV sV^i\nYL iWAvnln oAso £oC\W Vo r«MjgoVcy>e a*M Pb oA*>o Ey&jjAfl&W-f evj\A«nce c-£ a 5y\texnei\ f VT\c^» Vooa Vo\ coG?ft?&
aV flp^-^qoHiaoV PrCWik ^KuwVtyibr Ben 6^on o>#o\)67fl ~W>)
Ofk< ~TVfry\yflcm $bo £cnUeA 4o ilnVtodupe. •Ka/Icx QirtesS aUW^4 fo
W\g, YfleAfy (^P aUachongAV, £x\nbA O, The, DUO aftA ffaiVwcM *c
"l)Ot 0^0 °fo Q^Vucyv? QQrl Qgt^6^7 l/VaAto ReG*A&j irQ^re^ OflPfcteXi^
p£ XT\DJ\^ \res ^KkA ccvx,\A W a^eA Vo pirg-PX^ £r hf^l U (prrfp^rK/
A^Vda.e seen? oVciivyv on ^k
AW—^A^V"oiLjOte"
tyy^ W (XfftOrciW ua&5 nol. Oh, TW> Dv/£> uoirfr ta^U onto*? yHUcz)
________ fyuao giV 6o^5^0~HHHk<) tU3hcn astaa tea?? Yw oibkcJaf
Vj^Cyg? Vi^T V\us>VjoaA^ ^n^e' 5feeC>voC>N) a^C\f.TrQAxny\- yo\,H ^tlo(o \\(*5rfa
Of\pj, CoAe? N-g-A-t^ Vo W pefpcJiVrdWWc^ W_(Vk^Vojr\A ffocfof \rfc£ hir
rflffi&'hVg-flSftisfoncp rjafru pyemia OO raxfficb Q^Vare Vo ^(V? a mflVmn
VW VQAXYvChtv^ mvten&a o^xVk Aq<»jf, W,n Ctw&ctCe.^ Vo supprt-V V)P>
lefV \o \W nauu-t- iV t*? Wte AuV{ sV VW Aefen^ a^omeY U afremfo- Ah^mu.^
5kVe 7ka fh\MtaQ£lto. //) D'f$PrM\ fault- -~Tlur.i&u fr.ofHie. pre/salAy
Jh^pypLb Wcn.^ Npeo^e-f* TheeS) tvfhmies
Jo^ViNyyw.^ icrttfltoA cx\A ftUcrpAy? AyA YYVc Oqt^ l-^ a teg^t-l gay*
DtlecctV? ^ujai Vq\\1^ WV cxid qV f(V^ W aAA Qoy-7^ i? ViH(u>nr-o^,^ T^o^eg. -T/V~W» ue\-ti pq> ^ghne^as^
)ft\^o ^,^jY"ee~VriTiraJA%vrol ^ 9er foU"y K>»or) C^> =>WA aAcL ^roofc-f ^>ee T^Trart?,
ydV^ V3fl lire 7^3^) >flbo n0f5. C^\^ "Te^VC^ W (xr"^ ^
„pYM]^Jft©-^:V-tam-/"
4^UAc€. tpo^W \>f, ^uHcuiaV ^0 to^toA topcoat ^iVr^e qjo^U tee,
££&^5_^V<^\Jb^
Q^Vyw8_feL_o"
(ftVOUAA, for fteuUio flaJftW "~\\PQ fePl! £rror^ \n Vofr Qlte.
-• \hfCfl^Aa£ A?(Hb pxreA ^ Yio^tVi^ \W voir Dfte tuos eVferfte,
PGr#°l
^cK.\sOh AW^KQ^mg. cauV V>^\A \W a pvo^emAc^ a^oV Ovc^fVt^jf^hfh^
^WtT rdice vtolare^ Wo e4jaaf p^Ucf non clause•;. ^.bon v< k:e»Auc h,c
W\A \W\A remm»l Q-£ "Scfr M to\xxck uenivg w^mber^ -gsWbl^W Apr^ W\£ M^Am^,te\Vu4- ^ p^gon shd/be flati,
Vo y&fa \W nvvuf) aVa CJfJVnim^ rofMrrlran gfcg.pA mpcn 5\iV£rcrmA- prerf--
aefeneA go <&CAeA& y\goeS6tuv^J \o aswtoai aVtCo/ ctf fae^ \fcyofe afeoLgctuxJUe domM
£>£ \\ys eft"ci o£ w^ QkntftA-J 0-V-Hv offense» tu ^ve^aA- ft\W p_vi^nc^ esrpAWj pve^AWi-fi;/) s^
v* Q'ce^ieAV^ VW 9^c=eaY\oA ^.VStlo^vo^ ^«ju> Art».l ^v»()J(cui^A 0(\krV VVie. -f(\te€ k>^*V
_C^eJ\!0rV\XAp>&\ft? \c&\frto/H _"^42. pVolecuVfttfl kwuuJ csr SV\tM^ We kywxuvi
o£W\q Qivh(W| _"uyv-^ pfttV^ a\usV ^uj \WV UYW^iAb ajo/efois"t")
Vft We (XJfec^eA ^vfrycvaAV o£VW ^, oJ\A3P) aWVV fl\o<5galVfito klTAur Muy
_g3rfrtt0Ywi tvyyg) ^oAs2 A"_lA.- flV Obra^ »&tnVei w\A- WtrfteA VV^VWVtfivA
ypysoeA yn^ &\W) AfoAa Cs»rVo A^uWAW- p^pcM-wiKire p\Yftrant c/eoaplrsf)
(MM ft\f,&A cWb y^V &V WckA W/fpVfoo WVffln Octrees• ,k(K/U
r^y^ kftAft fcnyUc,. ^YAu^rA \J, sVvh <£BF\ ftWi A.\-' k> be P^a0oAft^t^dAv.y\ai9g.ft> M4l &ftOkW'ft-Vitus'? yi^ be.
" kfvAft f&Vft XruvVttA V\or (te/paW o^ beftv^ Wci^ysrf rt/lA -(W>^ fa.g*gg_
^c<^vaI v(_x^eA &\\caj»v»3 y^erw, /Wn^-iOi-aoia^'"^
Pfr#//
_f)Q - UffikP) »aftfy SWfreisVvtfoMW<\ \Wnfoe,r \fameJH (fr^i/ier OAA former. Sujcik?
C ~^mv> fWy htufXGtX Irato^h. y^W XWvk^A
\\dV 4<2-La\i_ rOrt^A q^ be^v^e4 or ^cck^sae ~Tr.~[mtt?, \jo[S Q$'3M lina^-jf)
OAA ^te^.(c>vL~{r< -fm.% yo[^ ffc)laa fife. ^-gP^) VCenngf/? QrA/A^i^r 4"frf/y^
\\(\L OayYlon ^yim WiSpy*. \VuV ^tV^ Mr, toonA ^ ft^y -fa/-
fflft CWw ?^ tifV. Wfy4- O-VfrW W°k Wefo^f s)1)1 fey ^Hfe^ 46^ru?
$&smJ£b#—*>) p^,6l lev*. ViQ .5)»>ifa/ /Qhri for/ifou
%ckA \\e \\P^er\Wyr ^ \T> air W- a qWloxf )'K^V^to^S V-et>Vefoe> KhkHheiru^
Wo "i,^ on coqt rOae. Q\0jCv^ VokWu Q\ Vbz&u&pr ^eoJ^ (7Trc7rouT$ ,l/o/<7
p^ i14 Uir\£"5ff7*ftfc ^Vq. &q>MV dg^c>>e. J.tlv"Tr«TQn9.Vrd(>7p^i, /o/ //in.
ura> TioV q_ veflVV VA ^»-(WV vtoo^ Wocm^h^ aA^ 5Vx:W^ i^ IraA^VoU^p^4.°k_
Va^b V p^\on Y-1^7 W^V \?uA- ycA \e6>&/^
/VW/IWy _foftfri /W- /^ ^ over/raw He pa9m ih JDhU>,-£kia^WfrwL
-(JL^JV£.hVtm(m^_cjo.Q^_J" -PreXaUgcu \\Y\^p or^Vvjj^\Y0^ fcviuuw Of\n
^6 ^y^ckVi>) ^ -^ c^eA^ rexiY^ u)h^h \W^Te ft" a cop^ o£6t Y\£aJ>0€A' ^ro^.cai<^ 0^\?7© Y^ oC SYioh,VACtc iCVUs" OOrcOe^Y^
J______
(AW; oVAccJ recowkA jnVg-fure^ VhoJr WroJra.c(rer qjojo KtoV ^tox/v^cjJh^o
cjli<^Vcwe^*6x-e Q^Q. cavkc^ tWeAtaSH NMUy^ ^d3))5^047510 or Re/>
VYV>H' tuflftsfV crvVy Wv^leAy aVMno. $ft\ftg Wfgvisc; ^mcfo kflooifetiq^ ^ f//7
Vff WYvQvAr" Vo ^V ch^-e^ ;v\VW A$_ fcbV)W^/ o~V /Dry <2rrte
rt^AdS^ Qoe^ r)o4- V(V AV\2 okxrfpi-rfro o-f Wr?/
fcoio ikiwj\h I) The actosS
Al^J^
W V> qhc(xuc ojiVAii^ Vs) vto *5e brfek fifm FcfrA ujco tay/\ctA ace*?? £ ^
J. ft?#/y
OV Qdjq&k Lvf\\)0\)Jr fY\r/fgife. pro se brfeP. %_) '^eUQfjjMtkjXCZes') CaaSeA
\\iYn ftL\ofli info*/-Du& k Ifa deprmiw 0^ kw lihra^f ^wnmi or)
Via? re^VUi m %5f ^?rrfod^ ^/(/(y -h> o/?(y argue hese po-fth
W Ao\(Ce Z/Art fed flat &e* etchltety pastfuy h'~J eiPfteulfartd.ca5e.i W^G^
¥\\&) all /VTo4ron-> ayu cfioittn-? §* e*to*y offline Jhal he. ha.? hiauikty*.
eJfocr*!' n* Ha fo/>, rTlr/<&r± Wc0Ye tk fafopsuA o-f-fifflwk UiM*
{he m hi*? mohfa? ftleJ, -fir Qckn&n? at hh ^ p*epa/r prolocutor, QA ftq*Kil .ftln(rifcho^/S'"-
OV H Floor tGw\\b\>se. 1QQ (Vt ^oaAoj^j TijVg^TX ^-90^ n^A
Defmdcuii ftp Se.
Onto**, Ti nq&ol
CoaA o^
"%J"^q"^s^\^ Q^mcLoj? _3cxsl
<\jg,ta~)> 0030*3-0^
^w\o-^i(h^if>^)ftn
ftppelM
"The sVafe o£ (exaa
j^pj__t_
: ; pM¥k>
``^\\t> QQQd^ lamg. \o be. heari. on \W, c^y&A^g QryisYi Wenne^f ,
OAVllO rtiiyni Vo Vljed rj 'Tfofto'j J*\ th turf (-toang on .k?.
"~Pa7 ik /nofov &f eftw,f&? p-flfoe iXl i^p k!n*-j ft inn, bench (juoumutleJ ._
blCfr jo \\\'1 /o a f"Xdocame/i'L^cvifb fryJrutfm?
gcce^ k> omY-/ \eyIttwkxtiJ p& foA/Tbe ^tyffh raaiA^y Jar/ P 'Duppb^eJ ^prm/h
bee/) \wtc 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967) and Gainous v.
State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). We affirm.
Analysis Pursuant to Anders v. California
Appellant's counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders and Gainous, stating that he
has diligently reviewed the appellate record and is of the opinion that the record reflects no
reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. He further relates that he is well
acquainted with the facts in this case. In compliance with Anders, Gainous, and High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), Appellant's brief presents a chronological summation
ofthe procedural history ofthe case, and further states that Appellant's counsel is unable to raise
any arguable issues for appeal.1 We have considered counsel's brief and conducted our own
1Counsel for Appellant has certified that he provided Appellant with a copy ofthis brief. Appellant was
given time to file his own brief in this cause. The time for filing such abrief has expired, and we have not received
a pro se brief.
independent review of the record. We have found no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178
S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Conclusion
As required, Appellant's counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. See In re Schulman,
252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d
503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We carried the motion for consideration with the merits.
Having done so and finding no reversible error, Appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw is
hereby granted, and the trial court's judgment is affirmed. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at
408-09.
Counsel has a duty to, within five days of the date of this opinion, send a copy of the
opinion and judgment to Appellant and advise him of his right to file a petition for discretionary
review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 411 n.35. Should Appellant
wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either
retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or he must file a pro se petition for
discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from
the date of this opinion or the date the last timely filed motion for rehearing is overruled by this
court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the
clerk for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in the case. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3(a). Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the
requirements ofRule 68.4 ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.4;
In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 408 n.22.
Opinion delivered February 27, 2015.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., andNeeley, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
FEBRUARY 27, 2015
NO. 12-13-00308-CR
DAVID EUGENE FORD,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
Appeal from the 114th District Court
of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-1281-12)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and brief filed herein,
and the same being considered, it is the opinion of the court that there was no error in the
judgment.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of
the court below be in all things affirmed, and that the decision be certified to the court below
for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., andNeeley, J.
V'
-p&Q
9 <=£ P :!i S
*
o
m
i
m
______'
—*4i
-is
S&
— "{)
?
^r
^«—:
;«'.• JS
•'•&:
•-^
at-
^
Hi
#
?< so o
•^'
fi
eft £
•I • ^ €
3