United Parcel Service, Inc. and Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually and as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, and Samuel Rankin, Minors ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                ACCEPTED
    04-014-00494-CV
    FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    4/17/2015 5:48:09 PM
    KEITH HOTTLE
    CLERK
    NO. 04-014-00494-CV
    FILED IN
    4th COURT OF APPEALS
    IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS                 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS                     4/17/2015 5:48:09 PM
    KEITH E. HOTTLE
    Clerk
    UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and ROLAND LEAL
    Appellants/Cross-Appellees
    v.
    ROBERT SCOTT RANKIN, Individually; RACHELLE RANKIN,
    Individually and as Next Friend for AVERY RANKIN, a Minor; as Next
    Friend for KARA RANKIN, a Minor; and as Next Friend for SAMUEL
    RANKIN, a Minor
    Appellees/Cross-Appellants
    On Appeal from the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Honorable Cathy Stryker, Presiding Judge
    Trial Court Cause No. 2011-CI-07922
    CROSS-APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
    REPLY TO CROSS-APPELLEES’ SURREPLY TO ARGUMENT IN
    CROSS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF THAT RULE 167.4(a) IS INVALID
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Cross-Appellants, Robert Scott Rankin, Rachelle Rankin, Avery Rankin, Kara
    Rankin, and Samuel Rankin (the “Rankins”), by and through their undersigned
    CROSS-APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO CROSS-APPELLEES’ SURREPLY
    TO ARGUMENT IN CROSS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF THAT RULE 167.4(a) IS INVALID - Page 1 of 4
    attorneys, hereby move the Court for an Order allowing them to file a Reply to Cross-
    Appellees’ Surreply to Argument in Cross-Appellants’ Reply Brief That Rule
    167.4(a) is Invalid, and in support thereof would respectfully show the Court the
    following:
    The Court granted Cross-Appellees’ Motion for Leave to File Reply to New
    Argument in Cross-Appellants’ Reply Brief That Rule 167.4(a) is Invalid on April 14,
    2015. Cross-Appellants request that the Court allow them to file their Reply to
    Cross-Appellees’ Surreply in that it will assist the Court by providing argument and
    authority. Cross-Appellees are not opposed to Cross-Appellants’ Motion for Leave.
    WHEREFORE, Cross-Appellants pray that this Court grant them leave to file
    their reply to Cross-Appellees’ Surreply to Argument in Cross-Appellants’ Reply
    Brief That Rule 167.4(a) is Invalid, which is being electronically filed simultaneously
    with this Motion, and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem to be
    just and proper.
    CROSS-APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO CROSS-APPELLEES’ SURREPLY
    TO ARGUMENT IN CROSS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF THAT RULE 167.4(a) IS INVALID - Page 2 of 4
    Respectfully submitted,
    THE PERRIN LAW FIRM
    1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 6050
    Dallas, Texas 75201
    Telephone: (214) 646-2004
    Facsimile: (214) 646-6117
    Email: dougperrin@perrinlaw.org
    markperrin@perrinlaw.org
    /s/J. Mark Perrin
    Doug Perrin
    State Bar No. 15796520
    J. Mark Perrin
    State Bar No. 24013313
    REESE GORDON MARKETOS LLP
    750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 610
    Dallas, Texas 75201
    Telephone: (214) 382-9810
    Facsimile: (214) 501-0731
    Email: pete.marketos@rgmfirm.com
    Pete Marketos
    State Bar No. 24013101
    KEELING & DOWNES, P.C.
    1500 McGowen Street
    Houston, Texas 77004
    Telephone: (832) 214-9900
    Fax: (832) 214-9908
    Email: bck@keelingdownes.com
    Byron Keeling
    State Bar No. 11157980
    ATTORNEYS FOR
    CROSS-APPELLANTS
    CROSS-APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO CROSS-APPELLEES’ SURREPLY
    TO ARGUMENT IN CROSS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF THAT RULE 167.4(a) IS INVALID - Page 3 of 4
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I have conferred with counsel for Cross-Appellees about the merits of this
    Motion and was advised that Cross-Appellees do not oppose the relief requested in
    this Motion.
    Certified this 17th day of April, 2015.
    /s/J. Mark Perrin
    J. Mark Perrin
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    This will certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
    document was forwarded to all counsel of record in the above cause through the
    Court’s electronic case filing system, on this the 17th day of April, 2015.
    Ricardo Reyna
    Audrey Haake
    Brock, Person, Guerra, Reyna P.C.
    17339 Redland Road
    San Antonio, Texas 78247
    W. Randall Bassett
    Bradley Pratt
    King & Spalding, LLP
    1180 Peachtree Street, NE
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309
    H. Victor Thomas
    King & Spalding, LLP
    1100 Louisiana, Suite 4000
    Houston, Texas 77002
    /s/J. Mark Perrin
    CROSS-APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO CROSS-APPELLEES’ SURREPLY
    TO ARGUMENT IN CROSS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF THAT RULE 167.4(a) IS INVALID - Page 4 of 4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00494-CV

Filed Date: 4/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016