Adam Lamar Brooks v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                 IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-13-00409-CR
    ADAM LAMAR BROOKS,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the County Court at Law No. 1
    Brazos County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 11-01734-CRM-CCL1
    ORDER
    Adam Lamar Brooks was convicted of indecent exposure and sentenced to 120
    days in jail with a $1,000 fine. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.08 (West 2011). Brooks
    filed a motion to suppress his statements in which he generally contended he did not
    voluntarily make any statements to police. After two hearings, the motion to suppress
    was denied. Brooks requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, but none were
    made.
    The Court of Criminal Appeals has said, “Under article 38.22 of the Texas Code
    of Criminal Procedure, ‘[i]n all cases where a question is raised as to the voluntariness
    of a statement of an accused, the [trial] court ... must enter an order stating its
    conclusion as to whether or not the statement was voluntarily made, along with the
    specific finding of fact upon which the conclusion was based, which order shall be filed
    among the papers of this cause.’” Vasquez v. State, 
    411 S.W.3d 918
    , 920 (Tex. Crim. App.
    2013) (quoting art. 38.22, sec. 6). In Vasquez, the Court held that “written findings are
    required in all cases concerning voluntariness. The statute has no exceptions.” 
    Id. We abated
    this proceeding once to obtain the required findings of fact and
    conclusions of law. We received findings and conclusions from the trial court judge
    who heard the pre-trial motion to suppress. However, the motion to suppress was
    relitigated at trial before a visiting trial court judge.
    Accordingly, this appeal is abated to the trial court so that the visiting trial court
    judge, the Honorable Terry Flenniken, can make findings of fact and conclusions of law
    regarding whether Brooks’ statements were voluntary. These additional findings of fact
    and conclusions of law must be prepared, signed, and filed as a supplemental clerk’s
    record with this Court within 28 days from the date of this Order.
    PER CURIAM
    Brooks v. State                                                                         Page 2
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeal abated
    Order issued and filed April 16, 2015
    Brooks v. State                         Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-13-00409-CR

Filed Date: 4/16/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015