in Re Joshua Tyrone Lane ( 2015 )

of
May . ^'7^SW
loJ^t/9 7/Jt>y£ //9^S£ J?S0,S^' |
I/.
I
MoS. 3cSJ£> //if S&72JX.
Ke*/e*//%. 7r//f
C/V
f/f£// of CoAA/^/S
2/>AAAJA/ dA AA/A /A/AjrAS AAA £olAS&:
2JAAX of /9t///j/j:AjrAs JL
S/AA/mAAX /*J SAoUJ A£ 3/A-/A&/ Ad>£/faSe
K£/A/0/C //AS SAolJA AAJ J£aaoASA/#A£
&Af ///s Md/AdA AAS Jez^ A/?AJ 0A
3/MJ//A Ao Atf£ /fAA^A/*^ o'A A&£
f//AA ColsA /
h
£*JCAisjto~/ /?^A> //A/ex. /
CfrA/A/cA/e aA S£A/ojtlXZZ^S
i crex./rr/J
S
! ^ soxd r/Xyf/7 crtxy/rsj
i
_J^
: /toJA' tS- /7S& CocsT a* */S*'J
A
A
MM
0>
S7/?XImX«sX 0A AAA tAfA
/Me fcMXXo* Sz^X oX Xsfse^Xzj A A Xcsxxaj Xe j0^£ xh>~
dfA /XoXfj JA C/)sc Ac^Xf^s sXX72-y, jyxxj-/
'Wi/*"* aA 3"'*^*y/s< *>xs st* axa/xxa
/I X/XAtA /At SMAC Set/eon XASX Ate m«Ka
Mou* X£ Sas/m se*. AXAX^X yf" s/tus/
MS XAC/ /fXtssX XA
Jsste.. PAAS£A/£/? AAA AAJ^I^X \
As AX /?AA6t.ses oX S/scsxXXdA a>A XXe. yAAX.
3c*JS AoX A XcX£ oA y? XXa*£XX AiaX/aA XAAX
A/?s XeeA XsXse^Xf* Xo XA£ XA^X £o^A s?^ 1
TAjyX/AX AtXX AXX. \
S7XXd/?/J ^ fa/'SJAj :
tOXXJSX /O AesA,*, J £ZXA d£M^A Ae*
xyjA \i
SeyA,s~AAc£ j ^d £Jy y? s^Xts^ Ac *&. \
U r/, I, A <*"»**-' sAot./^ ^
d£A,£d XAXX )AAJ AAXA aA J/fS/y*~y'ys z0yS
'*%%£'. " **** "* /a^
I 2//S \X£// SfSXy^d XA/fA A AA/td. docsX As ~fitrA
I £e?A/vdSo £eJs/d£s£-A MoXXoX AAtzV XX y/s?S AaA
\ l?ecA AsfscAAeJ A/A SX/d MoAAaS. />~* AA*^~
focAAAoSpyyAXAyAJesu^S Ahr /lesA*^****-.
C^XdX^AS
foXT-XAoAf AfAAAAoS SAa^y^ j£ jyAXAcfyp
AC AAs deMoSj/AMrs AxAA AAA JaaJs ZV^Z
AXJ AAAxA Ao AAA. CMr
//A/AA
Xa/AAox AxXAj Avx Xcfx/xA *&r~ 3lsS
CexAAA/'cxAA- aA a-*/xAr,*
OS~AB 7^AA/tA ma/ AbAS A£ s^x AXXr
A*A. Oatf osxAocsXcA AAA ArAiya Ao SXXe
AMy/A of'• y^ASAA^cs AX Ay?/A A/Vs- A&-
CoASAAAYAs/A f/7 /£. ^ ytfS£*A AS. SASA?
//
IMAV A
1 Zaaa/aa W *A 3x1a-Assess
NOS. 54972-1
54973-1
EX PARTE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
§
§ 300™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT
§
JOSHUA TYRONE LANE § BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER
On this day came to be heard the Defendant's Motion for Post-Conviction DNA
Testing. The Court takes judicial notice of the Reporter's Record, the Clerk's Record,
and the Court's File. Having reviewed these documents and the affidavits and documents
submitted, the Court Finds that the Appellant has failed to show by a preponderance of
the evidence, that he would not have been convicted if exculpatory DNA results are
obtained as to the matters he requested be tested. The Applicant, therefore, is not entitled
to obtain additional DNA testing under Art. 64.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The Court further Orders the Alvin Police Department to retain possession of its
evidence until disposition of this claim is final to ensure the preservation and chain of
custody of the evidence.
The Court also Finds the Defendant has failed to show reasonable grounds for the
appointment of counsel as required under Article 64.01(c) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure. The Court DENIES the Defendant's Motion for DNA Testing and Request
for Appointment of Counsel.
Signed this the . day of , 2015.
Judge Presiding
RECEIVED
JAN 15 2015
Rhonda Barchak
Brazoria County
District Clerk
CocxA oX AAAAAAr
/A. AAsAAcA
w yyjySS SA/Xf/
/kuSyTS, 7AXAS 7P**z -**S*
W- JoS*** yxAZAASAaXAo
OoXXX/TA JAo*
fp/A'- 7>S-
AAxe^A AX./AA/A
AAA* CA-yyA;
//as* &e ^/^f/% M^r*%Z
X/y/f 0AX ^ j:s 7"
ICSS Co/re*.
f- 7^0/j*
8H HOUSTON, TEXAS
m 19 *
FR A. PR|NE
CHR»STOPH£H
j» wmju1
j CXse. Ae.
'SoSAcy use ^ljr „, _
AC/At^-** A S-J "** A"S7 £s
Ao7A*y
ss?oc.J ' ,c& y,, j
decoys ^ - RsBRb*
»stopher A. PR,NEj
t^si^iyz ,yy&2fA:
ar" r
to
I