Green, Marcus Anthony ( 2015 )

... . . .. ~'-JuJi 1.3 -:13 -rJ()SJ/f;'t?PS'/~ 007(!1, 4R · ' i ' ' - ' - --=~ll~.:~·- - - - - - - - ~ ``;ttd-``/J-~ __ ;fif!!,·.·~ -. .. ,(_d.Ukid_~_kJ_M. ~-Y-~5~- _· ~-~,!?~ o-13 -~ t'J5"``.0zl.lsf~ IJO?``-~;e_ ·. hd__·_ · ·~- ·. ,___-/Ae-~_hL-_~_(tru- Ml f/foZ£4 - . . /_115 . ·. ~-~·-Ml ;0 ``)- - `` d-_!!_p_'£.--_5!-- Z!P ``, #-fd·- L-_2t5p ·~--" • __ __ ,~L~-~--~ -_~_Cdiu.cA 4:iL-.'-----··~- _·----.-;-~---,---------~-n,;;,_t'=~--.-·. __---.--~-``-__:________:_ ' . ' ' . . . .. .. . . "' I . - `` ~-``- MJ. ~ &L·M; ~ -~· .·.•. . . '~-!fi_``---``--do~-- ) . . -------7 .' . . J . ' . • ·. .. ' • . .. • - -~-----``2&4·_·. /:tM_ ~:-.``- 2oW_· ._~-....· •.4-~ . ·. 1{;;;:/:k {j)____ lif;;:, c~ /I(J"/~ .. • . ,' . ' •• ' - - - - - - - -------------'---------'--- ) I . \ . ~ ``lob -~---~· Cf;t ~J a·-~' Jn;r-·· 1\,f. Engin Derkunt \ -:--· - Attorney at Law · 2400 Pearl Strcel, Austin, Texas 7870.5 .512-6/)6-:·31 68 . dcrklttlllaw®valt O:cOJn intent is that thegeneral provision prevail. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 479, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Sec. 311.027. STATUTORY. REFERENCES. Unless expressly provided otherwise, a reference to any portion of a statute or rule applies to all reenactments, revisions, or amendments of the statute or rule. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 479, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 131,. Sec. 2, eff. May 11, 1993. Sec. 311.028. UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION OF UNIFORM ACTS. A uniform act included in a code shall be construed to effect its general purpose to make uniform the law of tho~e states that enact it. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 479, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Sec. 311.029. ENROLLED BILL CONTROLS. If the language of the enrolled bill version of a statute conflicts with the language of any subsequent printing or .reprinting of the statute, the language of the enrolled bill version controls. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 479, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Sec. 311.030. REPEAL OF REPEALING STATUTE. The repeal of a repealing statute does not revive ~he statute originally repealed nor impair the effect of any saving_ provision in it. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 479, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. )(. ~ SAVING PROVISIONS. (a) Subsection (b), the reenactment, revision, amendment, or repeal of Except as provided by a statute does not affect: (1Y the prior operation of the statute or any prior action taken under it; (2) any validation, cure, right, privilege, obligation, or liability previously acquired, accrued, accorded, or incurred under it; ( 3) any violation of the statute or any penalty, ;'f forfeiture, or punishment incurred under the statute before its 7 ·~ ```` ONl \(·ll1 ·t' ~ l ``~-\We..t,f?r· ``~ J.-~ v L·~lf'+k·~·; J- ~ vvJL amendment o'? repeal; or (4) any inve~t~gation, proceeding, or remedy 1_3-tt: -`` co.nc e ming any P' i v ilege, obligation, liability, penalty, ~- cr]`` forfeiture, or punishment; and the investigation, proceeding, or ``)``~remedy may be instituted, continued, or enforced, and the penalty, ``J!~ fodeitu,e, o' punishment imposed, as if the statute had not been ~ ~·Y~ repealed or amended . .:~·~ ~ , . @ If the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment for any t.#- \'\.~s-·· }Y\. ``-offense is reduced by a reenactment, 'revision, or amendment of a ~uf U ·~ statute, the penalty, forfe.iture, or· punishment, i f not already. ·r~·6J1~)~- imposed, shall be imposed aCcording to the statute as amended. ~- t.,~· , ':;>~ .. (c) The rep.eal of_ ~.O:S``tute by a code does not affect an ~ ~ ``amendment 1 reViSiOn 1 OY reenac'tment Of the Statute by the Same \``~gislatu'e that enacted ihe code. The amendment, 'evision, o, ~ ~>!": reenactment is preserved and given effect as part of the code L ':i`` ~ U n t.•~ ,_ ~ }W provision mnacted. that revised the statute so amended, revised, or ``.S``~ (d) If any provision of a code conflicts with a statute ~ ~ ~ ynacted by the same legislature that enacted the code, the statute ``¥"- VV' d~\'2, controls. . TY'\:. ~ .``Acts 19,5, 69th Leg., ch. 479, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. vr:- ~ ~J.rr' ~·, ~.~· ~i.JgtfY' Sec. 311.032. J SEVERABILITY OF STATUTES. (a) If any statute ;· .•. ~ ~:~ contains a provision for severability, that provision prevails in ~- \,y ·`` . interpreting that statute. ~ (b j If any statute contains a provision for nonseverability, that provision prevails in interpreting that statute. ..~ (c) In a statute that does not contain a provision for severability or nonse.verability, if any provision of the statute or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the ( statute that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of the statute are severable. Acts 1985, 69th Leg.·, ch. 40g, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. 8