Lerma, Jose Angel ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                      PD-0745-15
    PD-0745-15                            COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Transmitted 6/17/2015 10:26:13 PM
    Accepted 6/19/2015 2:00:11 PM
    ABEL ACOSTA
    NO. _____________________________                                     CLERK
    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
    CAUSE NO. 13-13-00369-CR
    (Transfer Case No. 05-13-00765-CR)
    __________________________________________________________________
    APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
    OF OPINION AND JUDGMENT IN CAUSE NO. 13-13-00369-CR
    (Transfer Case No. 05-13-00765-CR) ABOUT THE JUDGMENT IN
    CAUSE NO. NO. 219-8193-2012 FROM THE 119th DISTRICT COURT
    OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
    __________________________________________________________________
    JOSE ANGEL LERMA, Appellant
    June 19, 2015                            VS.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    __________________________________________________________________
    APPELLANT’S FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
    TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
    __________________________________________________________________
    COMES NOW, JOSE ANGEL LERMA, APPELLANT, by and through his
    attorney, Derek M. Harkrider, and files this first unopposed motion for extension
    of time to file a Petition for Discretionary Review (PDR), and in support thereof
    would show as follows:
    1.       This is an appeal from the 119th Judicial District Court of Collin
    County, Texas.        On August 16, 2012, a grand jury in Collin County, Texas
    returned and filed a True Bill of Indictment against the Defendant, Jose Angel
    Lerma, charging him with Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), a third degree felony.
    On May 1, 2013, a jury found the Defendant guilty of the offense of Driving While
    Intoxicated (DWI), a third degree felony. The Appellant was sentenced by the trial
    court to ten (10) years imprisonment, however the sentence was suspended and the
    defendant was placed on community supervision for seven years.
    2.    The Defendant appealed the conviction and sentence to the Court of
    Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. Pursuant to Texas Government
    Code § 73.001, the Supreme Court ordered the transfer of the case to the Thirteenth
    Court of Appeals for the purpose of equalizing the dockets. After briefs were filed
    by the Appellant and the State, on April 23, 2015, the Thirteenth Court of Appeals
    issued a Memorandum Opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment. Appellant
    timely filed a Motion for Rehearing, and Alternatively, Motion for Rehearing En
    Banc. On May 21, 2015, the Thirteenth Court of Appeals denied the motions for
    rehearing. Accordingly, the deadline to file a Petition for Discretionary Review is
    on June 20, 2015.
    3.    The Appellant desires to file a Petition for Discretionary Review
    (PDR). Although Derek Harkrider had been hired by Appellant to represent him
    before the Thirteenth Court of Appeals, Mr. Harkrider was not initially contracted
    -2-
    to represent Appellant to draft and file a PDR with the Court of Criminal Appeals
    of Texas. On Monday, June 15, 2015, Mr. Harkrider was hired by Appellant to
    draft and file a PDR and represent the Appellant in proceedings before the Court of
    Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    4.     Because Mr. Harkrider was just recently hired for appellate
    proceedings before the Court of Criminal Appeals, he needs additional time in
    order to research, draft and file a PDR.      At this time, Appellant requests an
    extension of time of an additional 30 days from the original deadline (June 20,
    2015), which would be until July 20, 2015, in order to file a PDR with this Court.
    5.     Pursuant to Rule 68.2(c), the Court of Criminal Appeals may extend
    the time to file a petition for discretionary review if a party files a motion
    complying with Rule 10.5(b) no later than 15 days after the last day for filing the
    petition. The Appellant has filed this Motion for Extension of Time within the
    requisite time period. Therefore, the Appellant requests that the Court of Criminal
    Appeals to extend his time to file the PDR for an additional 30 days after the
    original deadline.
    6.     This is the FIRST request for extension of time or motion for leave to
    file PDR requested by the Appellant. Accordingly, no prior extensions have been
    granted.
    -3-
    7.    The State of Texas, Appellee, is UNOPPOSED, regarding this motion.
    8.    This motion is not requested for the purpose of delay, but so that
    justice may be done.
    WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant respectfully
    requests the honorable Court to grant an extension of thirty (30) days from the
    original deadline (June 20, 2015) to file a Petition for Discretionary Review, which
    would be an extension of time until July 20, 2015.
    Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ Derek M. Harkrider
    DEREK M. HARKRIDER
    Attorney at Law
    harkriderlaw@gmail.com
    TBN: 24000601
    P.O. Box 524138
    Houston, Texas 77052
    (956) 318-0099 Telephone
    (956) 318-0877 Facsimile
    Counsel for Appellant
    -4-
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, DEREK M. HARKRIDER, hereby certify that on June 17, 2015, a true
    and correct copy of the foregoing document has been forwarded via electronic
    delivery to the State’s counsel of record, District Attorney Hon. Greg Willis, and
    Hon. John Rolater and Hon. Libby Lange, Appellate Division, at 2100 Bloomdale
    Road, Suite 100, McKinney, Texas 75071.
    /s/ Derek M. Harkrider
    DEREK M. HARKRIDER
    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
    I hereby certify, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(3),
    that the foregoing motion conforms with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4, in
    that this brief is a computer generated document created in Corel Wordperfect X5,
    is printed in a conventional typeface, to-wit, New Times Roman, in 14-point font,
    and the computer generated word count of the parts of this motion to be counted
    according to Rule 9.4(i)(1) is 618 words, excluding the caption, signature block,
    certificate of compliance and certificate/proof of service. Therefore, this document
    complies with the word count requirements as it does not exceed 15,000 words.
    /s/ Derek M. Harkrider
    DEREK M. HARKRIDER
    -5-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: PD-0745-15

Filed Date: 6/19/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016