Vaughn Monroe v. State ( 2015 )

Sherry Radack Christopher a. Prine Chief Justice Clerk of the Court Terry Jennings Janet Williams Evelyn Keyes Chief Staff Attorney Laura Carter Higley Phone: 713-274-2700 Jane Bland Michael Massengale Court of Appeals Fax: 713-755-8131 Harvey Brown Rebeca Huddle First District www.txcourts.gov/1stcoa.aspx Russell Lloyd 301 Fannin Street Justices Houston, Texas 77002-2066 June 05, 2015 Vaughn Monroe #09931-018 P.O. Box 879 Federal Medical Center - Devens Ayer, MA 01432 RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-14-00943-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1445412 Style: Vaughn Monroe v. The State of Texas This is to acknowledge your communication received May 14, 2015, with reference to your direct appeal. Please be advised that the current status ofyour appeal is: 1. Was dismissed. 2. Enclosed is a copy of the Opinion in your appeal. 3. Our records indicate that the mandate issued on May 8, 2015. Very truly yours, Christopher A. Prine Clerk of the Court Opinion issued February 24, 2015 In The Court of Sppeafa For The Jftrat ©fetrtct of Cexa* NO. G1-14-00943-CR VAUGHN MONROE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1445412 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Vaughn Monroe, was previously convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child, which carries with it a requirement to register MANDATE Court of Appeal* Jfirtft JBfetrttt of Cexasf NO. 01-14-00943-CR VAUGHN MONROE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 232nd District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1445412). TO THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before this Court, on the 24th day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words: The cause heard today by the court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 21, 2014. After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that it has no jurisdiction over the appeal. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed. The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment rendered February 24,2015. Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.