Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                         ACCEPTED
    01-15-00266-CV
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    6/10/2015 3:30:23 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    NO. 01-15-00266-CV
    IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON,FILED IN
    1st COURT OF APPEALS
    TEXAS                HOUSTON, TEXAS
    6/10/2015 3:30:23 PM
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    UNOCAL PIPELINE COMPANY
    Appellant,
    v.
    BP PIPELINES (ALASKA) INC., ET AL.
    Appellees
    APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
    OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF
    GIBBS & BRUNS, L.L.P.
    Mark A. Giugliano
    mgiugliano@gibbsbruns.com
    TBA No. 24012702
    Anthony N. Kaim
    akaim@gibbsbruns.com
    TBA No. 24065532
    J. Benjamin Bireley
    bbireley@gibbsbruns.com
    TBA No. 24076086
    1100 Louisiana, Suite 5300
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Telephone: (713) 650-8805
    Facsimile: (713) 750-0903
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT,
    UNOCAL PIPELINE COMPANY
    TO THE HONORABLE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:
    Appellant Unocal Pipeline Company (“Unocal”) files this Unopposed
    Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief, and would respectfully
    show the Court as follows:
    A.    The Present Deadline
    The record in this case was filed on May 19, 2015. Under the Texas Rules
    of Appellate Procedure, the brief for Appellants is due to be filed on or before June
    18, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).
    B.    The Length of the Extension Sought
    Appellant seeks a thirty (30) day extension of time in which to file its brief.
    Specifically, Appellant requests an extension from June 18, 2015 through and
    including July 20, 2015, to file its brief.
    C.    Number of Previous Extensions Granted
    This is the first extension Appellant has requested with respect to its brief.
    D.    Facts Explaining the Needed Extensions
    Appellant seeks an extension of time to file its brief for the following
    reasons.   First, Appellant’s brief involves two summary judgment rulings on
    separate causes of action and evidentiary rulings, which were extensively briefed
    and argued separately at the trial court. One of the rulings at issue was the subject
    of cross motions and the briefing included responses, replies, and sur-replies.
    1
    Accordingly, briefing both of these rulings in Appellant’s brief has resulted in the
    need for additional time.
    Second, Appellant’s counsel has unavoidable professional scheduling
    conflicts which interfere with the ability of Appellant to meet the present filing
    deadline. The primary drafter of Appellant’s brief is involved in a matter that has
    numerous depositions scheduled per week in June.
    Appellant has attempted to complete the brief by the present deadline, but
    the above-noted conflicts and the numerous issues to be briefed make it impossible
    to do so. This request is made not for improper purposes of delay, but so that
    justice may be done.
    Counsel for Appellees is not opposed to the requested extension.
    WHEREFORE, Appellant Unocal Pipeline Company respectfully requests
    that the Court grant this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File its Brief
    and extend the time for Appellant to file its brief from June 18, 2015 through and
    including July 20, 2015.
    Respectfully submitted,
    GIBBS & BRUNS, LLP
    By:    /s/ Mark A. Giugliano
    Mark A. Giugliano
    mgiugliano@gibbsbruns.com
    TBA No. 24012702
    Anthony N. Kaim
    akaim@gibbsbruns.com
    2
    TBA No. 24065532
    J. Benjamin Bireley
    bbireley@gibbsbruns.com
    TBA No. 24076086
    1100 Louisiana, Suite 5300
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Telephone: (713) 650-8805
    Facsimile: (713) 750-0903
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT,
    UNOCAL PIPELINE COMPANY
    3
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I certify that I conferred with counsel for Appellees, Michael V. Powell, who
    has indicated that Appellees are unopposed to the relief requested in this motion.
    /s/ Mark A. Giugliano      .
    Mark A. Giugliano
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that on the 10th day of June, 2015 I served a copy of the foregoing
    document upon the following attorneys of record via e-mail:
    Michael V. Powell
    Elizabeth L. Tiblets
    Locke Lord LLP
    2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2200
    Dallas, Texas 75201
    Fax: (214) 756-8520
    mpowell@lockelord.com
    etiblets@lockelord.com
    Steven G. Reed
    Lara E. Romansic
    Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, D.C. 20036-1795
    Fax: (202) 429-3902
    sreed@steptoe.com
    lromansic@steptoe.com
    /s/ Mark A. Giugliano    .
    Mark A. Giugliano
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00266-CV

Filed Date: 6/10/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016