Denise Gail Dooley v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              No.   05-1 4-00240-CR
    FILED IN
    IN The Sixth Court of       APPeals   6th COURT OF APPEALS
    TEXARKANA, TEXAS
    Texarkana, Texas             4/22/2015 3:42:39 PM
    DEBBIE AUTREY
    Clerk
    DENISE GAIL DOOLEY,
    AppeTTant,
    \/
    THE STATE OF TEXAS'
    Ag>peJ'lee.
    MOT]ON TO WITHDRAW PURSUANT TO
    AA/DERS   V. CALTFORNTA,386 U-S.738           (196'7)
    TO THE HONORABLE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS:
    NOW COMES   JEFF T. JACKSON, counsel for Appellant Denise
    Gai.l     Dooley,      and     hereby       moves to       withdraw      from
    representation         of    Appellant       pursuant    to     Anders     v'
    Cal-ifornia,    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1961) '                In support' of this
    mot-ion, counsel shows as follows:
    I.
    Counsel has    f hororrcrh I v
    9frv!             reviewed the record on appeal '
    :nrl
    CIII\-ti/    fnr
    !v!   fheSe
    urr\    reasons, is thoroughly familiar with the
    II.
    counsel- has,          in   the exercise   of    his   professional
    judgment, determined that                    the instant     case presentsi   no
    nonfrivolous issues for appeal, and, in accordance with the
    Supreme CourL's decision in Anders v. Cal-ifornia, 386 U'S'
    738 (L961), now so advise the court and requests permission
    to withdraw. Anders, id- at 144'
    III.
    In      accordance           with      Anders,     Counsel     has,
    contemporaneously with this motion, filed a brief outlining
    all  issues which might arguably support an appeal                          and
    exprlaining why t.hose issues are meritless . Anders, 
    Id. IV. counsel
    has furnished the appellant with a copy of said
    bri-ef, and a copy of this motion, thus apprising appeallant
    of counsel's actions-
    V.
    Having determined that the instant appeal is wholly
    ri rrnl orrs - and
    fIITVVMD,          qrIV h:rz'i
    IIqvIIIY ncr r:omnl
    vvrlrt/!Ivv i ecJ wi th tha l-rri
    v!!v  of i no and notice
    reqr-iirements of Anders v. Cal-if ornia, counsel now requests
    thal: he be allowed t.o withdraw, pursuant to Anders.
    WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED,                         iI    'i   s nrarzecl that   the
    Cou:rt grant counsel' s request and all-ow counsel to withdraw
    from this case, pursuant to Anders v. CaLifornia, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1961)     .
    pa                            

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-14-00240-CR

Filed Date: 4/22/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016