Nathaniel Frazier, Jr. AKA Nathaniel J. Frazier v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                  ACCEPTED
    03-14-00655-CR
    5200327
    THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    5/7/2015 4:26:09 PM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    CLERK
    NO. 03-14-00655-CR
    FILED IN
    3rd COURT OF APPEALS
    NATHANIEL J. FRAZIER, JR.                   §      IN THE COURT OF    APPEALS
    AUSTIN,  TEXAS
    §                 5/7/2015 4:26:09 PM
    vs.                                         §      THIRD JUDICIAL   DISTRICT
    JEFFREY   D. KYLE
    §                         Clerk
    STATE OF TEXAS                              §      SITTING AT AUSTIN, TEXAS
    MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL
    FOR APPELLANT NATHANIEL J. FRAZIER, JR.
    To The Honorable Justices of the Third Court of Appeals, Now Comes Justin S.
    Mock, in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant her
    Motion To Withdraw As Court Appointed Counsel For Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr., and
    for good cause shows the following:
    I.
    In the 391 sr Judicial District Court of Tom Green County, Texas, in a case
    styled, The State ofTexas vs. Nathaniel J Frazier, Jr.; Cause Number D-13-0958-SA,
    Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr. was charged by Indictment with the felony offense of Assault
    of Family/Household Member by Impeding Breath or Circulation.
    A jury trial took place on July 14, 2014. Frazier entered a plea of "not guilty" to
    charged offense and "not true" to the enhancement paragraph. At the conclusion of
    trial, the jury found Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr. guilty as charged by paragraph one of the
    Indictment. The trial judge heard punishment phase of the trial.          He found the
    enhancement paragraph to be true, and assessed punishment by sentencing Nathaniel J.
    Frazier, Jr. to serve a term of eighteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas
    Department of Criminal Justice. The appeal of the judgment of the trial court is
    currently pending before this Court.
    IL
    The United States Supreme Court does not obligate counsel representing a client
    on appeal to argue in support of grounds for reversal of the lower court's judgment
    when after a "conscientious examination" of the case, counsel determines appeal to be
    "wholly frivolous." Anders v. State of California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744 (1967). In such
    situations, the United States Supreme Court has outlined appropriate procedural steps
    to be taken by appellate counsel: 1) counsel is required to submit a brief examining the
    record for any point arguably in support of proper grounds for reversal on appeal; 2)
    counsel must furnish this brief to an indigent client enabling the client the right to file a
    pro-se brief based on points of appeal this individual maintains present proper grounds
    for appeal; and 3) counsel may request the appellate court grant counsel's request to
    withdraw from the obligation of providing further legal representation to the client on
    appeal. 
    Id. III. 2
            Counsel for Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr. prepared and filed an "Anders Brief' on
    behalf of Appellant. After a "conscientious examination" of the case, including a
    diligent review of the Record and applicable authorities, Counsel found an absence of
    meritorious grounds for appeal and has determined the basis of any appeal in this case
    would be frivolous in nature. Therefore Justin S. Mock, Counsel for Appellant,
    respectfully request this Court acknowledge and approve his request to withdraw from
    his court appointed duty of providing further legal representation to Appellant
    Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr. on original appeal.
    WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Counsel for Appellant pray this
    Court grant this Motion To Withdraw As Court Appointed Counsel For Nathaniel J.
    Frazier, Jr ..
    Respectfully submitted,
    Ellis & Mock, PLLC
    125 South Irving Street
    San Angelo, Texas 76903
    Tel: (325) 486-9800
    Fax: (325) 482-0565
    By: Isl Justin S. Mock
    JUSTIN S. MOCK
    State Bar No. 24064155
    Justin@ellisandmock.com
    Attorney for NATHANIEL J. FRAZIER,
    JR.
    3
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    This is to certify that on May 7, 2015, I conferred with Mr. Jason Ferguson,
    Assistant District Attorney, District Attorney's Office, Tom Green County, and he was
    not opposed to this request.
    Isl Justin S. Mock
    Justin S. Mock
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    This is to certify that on May 7, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and
    foregoing Motion to Withdraw as Court Appointed Counsel for Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr.
    was served in accordance with Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on
    each party and/or counsel as listed below:
    The State of Texas                            By Personal Delivery
    Mr. Jason Ferguson
    Tom Green County District Attorney
    124 West Beauregard A venue
    San Angelo, Texas 76903
    Appellee
    Mr. Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr.                 By Certified Mail
    TDCJNo. 01942796
    John B. Connally Unit
    899 FM 632
    Kenedy, TX 78119
    Appellant
    /s/ Justin S. Mock
    JUSTIN S. MOCK, Attorney for Appellant
    5
    ACCEPTED
    03-14-00655-CR
    5200327
    THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    5/7/2015 4:26:09 PM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    CLERK
    NO. 03-14-00655-CR
    NATHANIEL J. FRAZIER, JR.                 §      IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    §
    vs.                                       §      THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    §
    STATE OF TEXAS                            §      SITTING AT AUSTIN, TEXAS
    CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL
    In compliance with the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 378
    (1967), I, Justin S. Mock, court-appointed counsel for appellant, NATHANIEL J.
    FRAZIER, JR., in the above-referenced appeal, do hereby verify, in writing, to the
    Court that I have:
    I.    notified appellant that I filed a motion to withdraw as counsel with an
    accompanying Anders brief, and provided a copy of each to appellant;
    2.    informed appellant of his right to file a pro se response identifying what he
    believes to be meritorious grounds to be raised in his appeal, should he so
    desire;
    3.    advised appellant of his right to review the appellate record, should he
    wish to do so, preparatory to filing that response;
    4.    explained the process for obtaining the appellate record, provided a Motion
    for Pro Se Access to the Appellate Record lacking only appellant's
    signature and the date, and provided the mailing address for this Court; and
    5.    informed appellant of his right to seek discretionary review pro se should this
    Court declare his appeal frivolous.
    Respectfully submitted,
    Ellis & Mock, PLLC
    125 South Irving Street
    San Angelo, Texas 76903
    Tel: (325) 486-9800
    Fax: (325) 482-0565
    By: /s/ Justin S. Mock
    Justin S. Mock
    State Bar No. 24064155
    Attorney for NATHANIEL J. FRAZIER,
    JR.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-14-00655-CR

Filed Date: 5/7/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016