Miguel Arnoldo Peralta v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 18, 2014.
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-00955-CR
    No. 05-13-00956-CR
    MIGUEL ARNOLDO PERALTA, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. F06-15900-H, F13-12202-H
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis
    Opinion by Justice Lewis
    Miguel Arnoldo Peralta was convicted of felony assault resulting in bodily injury and
    involving family violence and burglary of a habitation. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 22.01(a),
    30.02(a) (West 2011); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp. 2013).
    The trial court assessed punishment, following the revocation of appellant’s community
    supervision, at ten years’ imprisonment on the assault case. The trial court assessed punishment
    at twelve years’ imprisonment on the burglary case. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief
    in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
    requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). The brief presents a professional
    evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See
    High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a
    copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he
    did not file a pro se response.
    We have reviewed the records and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    ,
    827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
    appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably
    support the appeals.
    We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
    /David Lewis/
    DAVID LEWIS
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    130955F.U05
    -2-
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    MIGUEL ARNOLDO PERALTA,                            Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    Appellant                                          No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    F06-15900-H).
    No. 05-13-00955-CR       V.                        Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis,
    Justices Fillmore and Evans participating.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered June 18, 2014.
    /David Lewis/
    DAVID LEWIS
    JUSTICE
    -3-
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    MIGUEL ARNOLDO PERALTA,                            Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    Appellant                                          No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    F13-12202-H).
    No. 05-13-00956-CR       V.                        Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis,
    Justices Fillmore and Evans participating.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered June 18, 2014.
    /David Lewis/
    DAVID LEWIS
    JUSTICE
    -4-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-00956-CR

Filed Date: 6/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015