Chad Eugene Appleton v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed June 18, 2014.
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-01245-CR
    No. 05-13-01246-CR
    CHAD EUGENE APPLETON, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court
    Hunt County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 28,881 and 28,882
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald
    Opinion by Justice Moseley
    Chad Eugene Appleton waived a jury and pleaded guilty to theft of property valued at
    $1,500 or more but less than $20,000 and evading arrest or detention while using a vehicle. See
    TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A), 38.04(a), (b)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2013). The trial
    court assessed punishment at eighteen months’ confinement in a state jail on the theft conviction.
    The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at thirty-five
    years’ imprisonment on the evading arrest conviction. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a
    brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets
    the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). The brief presents a professional
    evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See
    High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a
    copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he
    did not file a pro se response.
    We have reviewed the records and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    ,
    827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
    appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably
    support the appeals.
    We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
    ____________________________
    JIM MOSELEY
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47
    131245F.U05
    -2-
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    CHAD EUGENE APPLETON, Appellant                   Appeal from the 196th Judicial District
    Court of Hunt County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    No. 05-13-01245-CR       V.                       28,881).
    Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                      Justices O’Neill and FitzGerald
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered June 18, 2014.
    / Jim Moseley/
    JIM MOSELEY
    JUSTICE
    -3-
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    CHAD EUGENE APPLETON, Appellant                   Appeal from the 196th Judicial District
    Court of Hunt County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
    No. 05-13-01246-CR       V.                       28,882).
    Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley,
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                      Justices O’Neill and FitzGerald
    participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    Judgment entered June 18, 2014.
    / Jim Moseley/
    JIM MOSELEY
    JUSTICE
    -4-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-01246-CR

Filed Date: 6/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015