in Re: Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    '
    No. 08-14-00270-CV
    '
    IN RE: LINDA S. RESTREPO AND                              AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    CARLOS E. RESTREPO,                             '
    ON PETITION FOR
    Relators.         '
    WRIT OF PROHIBITION
    '
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relators, Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo, have filed a petition for writ of
    prohibition against the Honorable Carlos Villa, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 5 of El
    Paso County, Texas. Relators have also filed a motion to stay the proceedings in the trial court.
    The petition for writ of prohibition and the motion to stay are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    A writ of prohibition operates like an injunction issued by a superior court to control,
    limit, or prevent action in a court of inferior jurisdiction. Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals,
    
    767 S.W.2d 680
    , 682 (Tex. 1989); In re Cap Rock Energy Corporation, 
    225 S.W.3d 160
    (Tex.App.--El Paso 2005, original proceeding). The purpose of the writ is to enable a superior
    court to protect and enforce its jurisdiction and judgments. 
    Holloway, 767 S.W.2d at 683
    ;
    
    Caprock, 225 S.W.3d at 160
    . The writ is typically used to protect the subject matter of an appeal
    or to prohibit an unlawful interference with the enforcement of a superior court’s orders and
    judgments. 
    Holloway, 767 S.W.2d at 683
    . An appellate court does not have jurisdiction, absent
    actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding, to issue a writ of prohibition requiring that a trial
    court refrain from performing a future act. See In re Nguyen, 
    155 S.W.3d 191
    , 194 (Tex.App.--
    Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding); Lesikar v. Anthony, 
    750 S.W.2d 338
    (Tex.App.--Houston [1st
    Dist.] 1988, orig. proceeding). The Restrepos have not established that issuance of the writ of
    prohibition is necessary to protect the subject matter of an appeal or to prohibit interference with
    enforcement of an order or judgment of this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition and
    motion for emergency relief for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX.R.APP.P. 52.8(a), 52.10.
    October 8, 2014
    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
    Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J., (Senior Judge)
    (Barajas, C.J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment, not participating)
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-14-00270-CV

Filed Date: 10/8/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015