Ex Parte Ramone Coleman ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-15-00009-CR
    EX PARTE RAMONE COLEMAN
    ----------
    FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 9 OF TARRANT COUNTY
    TRIAL COURT NO. 1163456
    ----------
    MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
    ----------
    Ramone Coleman appeals the trial court’s October 15, 2014 denial of his
    postconviction application for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
    Ann. art. 11.072, § 8 (West Supp. 2014). Appellant filed his notice of appeal on
    January 13, 2015. On January 21, 2015, we sent him a letter stating our concern
    that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because the notice of appeal was not
    timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). We informed him that the appeal
    could be dismissed unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a
    1
    See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before February 2,
    2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3.
    Appellant filed a response in which he contends that his request for
    findings of fact and conclusions of law extended the deadline for filing the notice
    of appeal; it does not. See Ex parte Coleman, No. 02-13-00183-CR, 
    2013 WL 3064515
    , at *1 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth June 20, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not
    designated for publication) (rejecting appellant’s same argument in appeal from
    order denying prior article 11.072 application). Compare Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)
    (providing that time for filing notice of appeal is ninety days in civil appeals when
    request for findings of fact and conclusions of law is filed), with Tex. R. App. P.
    26.2(a) (providing that notice of appeal in criminal cases must be filed within
    thirty days of appealable order unless timely motion for new trial filed).
    Appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial that would have extended
    the time for filing his notice of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
    want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (providing that untimely notice of appeal
    deprives appellate court of jurisdiction).
    PER CURIAM
    PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    DELIVERED: March 5, 2014
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-15-00009-CR

Filed Date: 3/5/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015