Dan Daniel v. Robert Willis and Freestone County Sheriff's Office ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-13-00366-CV
    DAN DANIEL,
    Appellant
    v.
    ROBERT WILLIS AND
    FREESTONE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE,
    Appellees
    From the 87th District Court
    Freestone County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 13-022-CR
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On November 6, 2013, the Clerk of this Court sent the following letter to
    Appellant Dan Daniel after receiving his initial notice of appeal:
    Appellant has filed in this Court his notice of appeal, in which he
    asks that the Court advise him of his rights. Neither the judges nor the
    staff of this Court can give legal advice. Therefore, you may wish to
    contact 1) your attorney, 2) Inmate Legal Services, Texas Department of
    Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, P.O. Box 99 Huntsville, Texas
    77340, or 3) the trial court for further information or assistance.
    Appellant is also notified that the notice of appeal sent to this Court
    is defective in that it fails to identify the trial court judgment or other
    appealable order from which he desires to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    25.2(c), (f); 37.1. Appellant is ordered to file a proper amended notice of
    appeal with the trial court clerk, with notice given to this Court, within 30
    days from the date of this notice. If a proper amended notice of appeal is
    not filed in the trial court within 30 days from the date of this notice, this
    appeal must be referred to the Court for appropriate orders. TEX. R. APP.
    P. 37.1.
    On December 3, 2013, we received Daniel’s amended notice of appeal.                   It
    appeared that Daniel was attempting to sue Appellees Robert Willis and/or the
    Freestone County Sheriff’s Office in this Court for allegedly “stealing” his animals while
    Daniel was incarcerated.
    On December 18, 2013, the Clerk notified Daniel by letter that this Court does not
    have jurisdiction of an original claim for relief pertaining to alleged theft of animals and
    that his amended notice of appeal was defective in that it still failed to identify the trial
    court judgment or other appealable order from which he desired to appeal.
    Accordingly, the letter further stated:
    Appellant is ordered to file a proper amended notice of appeal with
    the trial court clerk, with notice given to this Court, within 30 days from
    the date of this notice letter. The amended notice of appeal should
    identify the trial court cause number of the case and the trial court
    judgment or other appealable order from which Appellant desires to
    appeal. Appellant should also attach a copy of the trial court judgment or
    other appealable order from which he desires to appeal.
    Appellant is also directed to separately file a written statement with
    this Court that clearly states the nature of this appeal.
    On January 16, 2014, we received a letter from Daniel accompanied by a
    document that states that he wants to sue Robert Willis, the Freestone County Sheriff’s
    Daniel v. Willis                                                                          Page 2
    Office, and others for “theft” of his animals while he was incarcerated. Neither the
    letter nor the document identifies any other trial court cause number, trial court
    judgment, or other appealable order from which Daniel desires to appeal. As stated in
    our December 18, 2013 letter to Daniel, this Court does not have jurisdiction of an
    original claim for relief pertaining to alleged theft of animals; therefore, we dismiss this
    appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
    time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.
    P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007); see also TEX. R.
    APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b),
    51.941(a), 51.208 (West 2013). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and
    order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The
    write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or
    reduces the fees owed.
    REX D. DAVIS
    Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeal dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed January 30, 2014
    [CV06]
    Daniel v. Willis                                                                      Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-13-00366-CV

Filed Date: 1/30/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015