Estate of Samson Hadis Alemayehu v. Robert D. Hemphill ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Opinion Filed June 10, 2014
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-00248-CV
    IN RE SAMSON HADIS ALEMAYEHU, DECEASED
    On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 12-1377-3
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald
    Opinion by Justice O’Neill
    Tsion S. Mekonnen appeals the trial court’s order granting Robert D. Hemphill’s
    application to pay attorney’s fees and reimburse costs in the amount of $6,961.85. This Court,
    by letter dated August 19, 2013, notified Mekonnen that her pro se brief did not comply with
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1 and informed her that failure to file an amended brief
    within ten days may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice from the Court.
    Mekonnen filed a motion to extend time to file a brief on August 29, 2013. We granted
    the motion and ordered her to file an amended brief by October 4, 2013. Mekonnen did not file
    an amended brief.
    We construe liberally pro se pleadings and briefs; however, we hold pro se litigants to the
    same standards as licensed attorneys and require them to comply with applicable laws and rules
    of procedure. Washington v. Bank of N.Y., 
    362 S.W.3d 853
    , 854 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no
    pet.). The law is well-established that, to present an issue to this Court, a party’s brief shall
    contain, among other things, a concise, non-argumentative statement of facts supported by record
    references, and clear and concise arguments with appropriate citations to authorities and the
    record. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1; 
    Washington, 362 S.W.3d at 854
    . Bare assertions of error, without
    argument or authority, waive error. 
    Washington, 362 S.W.3d at 854
    . Thus, when a party fails to
    adequately brief a complaint, she waives the issue on appeal. 
    Id. In her
    “brief,” Mekonnen appears to challenge the amount of attorney’s fees awarded;
    however, she has failed to provide any argument, analysis, or authorities that make her appellate
    complaint viable. By failing to adequately brief her complaint, she has waived review of it. 
    Id. Accordingly, we
    affirm the trial court’s judgment.
    130248F.P05                                          /Michael J. O’Neill/
    MICHAEL J. O’NEILL
    JUSTICE
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    In re Samson Hadis Alemayehu, Deceased               On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3,
    Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-13-00248-CV                                   Trial Court Cause No. 12-1377-3.
    Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.
    Justices Moseley and FitzGerald
    participating.
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is
    AFFIRMED.
    It is ORDERED that appellee Robert D. Hemphill recover his costs of this appeal from
    appellant Tsion S. Mekonnen.
    Judgment entered June 10, 2014
    /Michael J. O’Neill
    MICHAEL J. O'NEILL
    JUSTICE
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-00248-CV

Filed Date: 6/10/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015