in Re O.O. and A.G. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:         In re O.O. and A.G., Relators
    Appellate case number:       01-15-00430-CV
    Trial court case number:     2015-02330J
    Trial court:                 314th Juvenile District Court of Harris County
    On April 28, 2015, the trial court held a hearing pursuant to Texas Family Code
    section 262.201 and ordered that real party in interest, the Department of Family and
    Protective Services (“DFPS”), be awarded temporary managing conservatorship of the
    child, A.G. At that time, A.G. was placed in a medical facility for testing to determine
    the nature and extent of his developmental delays. In addition to awarding temporary
    managing conservatorship of A.G. to DFPS, the trial court limited O.O. and A.G.’s (“the
    parents”) visitation with and access to the child to only twice a week in the hospital. The
    parents filed a petition for writ mandamus challenging the trial court’s award of
    temporary managing conservatorship to DFPS, and they filed an emergency motion to
    stay the trial court’s order limiting their visitation.
    On May 8, 2015, this Court granted, in part, the relators’ emergency motion and
    stayed the trial court’s April 28 order to the extent that it had limited relators’ visitation
    with and access to their child. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). On May 22, 2015, DFPS
    filed an emergency motion to clarify and/or reconsider the partial stay of the April 28
    order, or in the alternative, to abate our stay order until after the trial court’s next status
    hearing, scheduled for May 28, 2015. DFPS contends that it has complied with this
    Court’s Order by providing the child with 24-hour supervision by DFPS staff to allow the
    parents 24-hour access, but that this 24-hour access has hampered DFPS’ efforts in
    finding temporary placement for A.G. before his discharge, which is scheduled for May
    28, 2015. The parents filed a motion to strike an affidavit accompanying DFPS’ motion
    to clarify and asked that we deny the motion.
    We deny the parents’ motion to strike and grant DFPS’ alternative motion to
    abate this Court’s May 8, 2015 Order staying the April 28, 2015 Order. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 52.10(c).
    We further direct the trial court to receive evidence at the May 28 status hearing
    and to make appropriate findings, including findings on the following issues:
    (1) new medical evidence obtained as a result of A.G.’s placement in the medical
    facility;
    (2) A.G.’s medical needs upon release from the medical facility and his parents’
    ability to comply with medical recommendations and any necessary court
    orders;
    (3) re-evaluation of its custody determinations pursuant to Family Code
    section 262.201 in light of the additional relevant information obtained
    and the change in A.G.’s placement following his release from the
    medical facility.
    Any party may move for further relief, including reinstating the stay, after the trial
    court’s May 28, 2015 status hearing has concluded. See 
    id. Further, relators
    are ordered
    to file a certified copy of the trial court’s order and to request a reporter’s record of any
    hearing, if any, within 10 days of the May 28, 2015 hearing. See 
    id. at 52.7(b).
           It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
     Acting individually       Acting for the Court
    Date: May 27, 2015
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00430-CV

Filed Date: 5/27/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015