City of Reno v. Arvel Corporation and B. Storm Phillips ( 2006 )

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

                                        NO. 2-05-437-CV

CITY OF RENO                                                                    APPELLANT

                                                   V.

ARVEL CORPORATION AND B. STORM PHILLIPS                       APPELLEES

                                               ----------

             FROM THE 415^TH DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered the parties= AJoint Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@ It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL B: GARDNER, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED:  October 5, 2006

---

^[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.