Mitx, Ltd., White Reno Investors, Ltd., and Wells Reno Investors, Ltd. v. Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineer, Inc. ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •  

     

     

     

     

     

                               COURT OF APPEALS

                                           SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                       FORT WORTH

     

                                            NO. 2-06-225-CV

     

    MITX, LTD., WHITE RENO INVESTORS, LTD.,                        APPELLANTS

    AND WELLS RENO INVESTORS, LTD.                                                     

     

                                                       V.

     

    GORDON S. SWIFT CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.                       APPELLEE

     

                                                   ----------

                FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                                   ----------

                      MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                                   ----------

    We have considered AAppellants= Amended Notice Of Dismissal Of Appeal.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

    Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

    PER CURIAM

    PANEL D:   HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

     


    DELIVERED:  September 21, 2006



    [1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-06-00225-CV

Filed Date: 9/21/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/3/2015