Chadrick Lee Chappell v. State ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •  

     

     

     

     

     

                                                   COURT OF APPEALS

                                                     SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                    FORT WORTH

     

     

                                            NO. 2-06-145-CR  

     

     

    CHADRICK LEE CHAPPELL                                                    APPELLANT

     

                                                       V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

     

                                                  ------------

     

                  FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

     

                                                  ------------

     

                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

     

                                                  ------------


    On October 6, 2003, the trial court entered a judgment revoking Appellant Chadrick Lee Chappell=s community supervision and sentencing him to six years= confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Consequently, his notice of appeal was due November 5, 2003.[2]  His notice of appeal was not filed until March 27, 2006; thus it was untimely.[3]

    Because the notice of appeal was untimely and it appeared we lacked jurisdiction, we sent a letter to Appellant on April 28, 2006, requesting a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Appellant did not respond.

    A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction.[4]  The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that, without a timely filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal.[5]  Because Appellant=s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction.[6]

     

     


    PER CURIAM

    PANEL D:   DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

     

    DO NOT PUBLISH

    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

     

    DELIVERED: June 22, 2006



    [1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

    [2]See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).

    [3]Id.

    [4]Id.

    [5]See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

    [6]See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2), 43.2(f).

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-06-00145-CR

Filed Date: 6/22/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/3/2015