Daniel Armendariz, Olivia Roman, Conrado Soltero, Miriam Maldonado and Leslie Cotter v. Cheryll Felder ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    DANIEL ARMENDARIZ, OLIVIA                          §
    ROMAN, CONRADO SOLTERO,                                              No. 08-13-00206-CV
    MIRIAM MALDANADO AND                               §
    LESLIE COTTER,                                                          Appeal from the
    Appellants,                         §
    41st District Court
    V.                                                 §
    of El Paso County, Texas
    CHERYLL FELDER,                                    §
    Appellee.                                             (TC# 2012-DCV-05828)
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should
    be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellants have not filed a brief or a motion
    for extension of time to file their brief, we dismiss the appeal.
    This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the
    appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation
    for such failure. TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 
    975 S.W.2d 61
    , 63
    (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Appellants’ brief was due to be filed on October 27,
    2013. After being notified that the brief was past due, Appellants filed a defective motion for
    extension of time to file the brief on December 20, 2013. The Clerk of the Court notified
    Appellants that the motion was defective and provided an opportunity for them to file an
    amended motion, but Appellants failed to do so. On January 22, 2014, the Court entered an
    order denying the motion because it did not comply with TEX.R.APP.P. 9.5 and 10.5(b)(1). On
    that same date, the Clerk notified Appellants that their brief was past due. The Clerk also
    informed the parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless,
    within ten days of the notice, a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal.
    Appellants have failed to file a proper motion for extension of time, their brief, or any response
    to the Clerk’s inquiry.     Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
    TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
    February 19, 2014
    YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
    Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-13-00206-CV

Filed Date: 2/19/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015