Ex Parte Benito Mojica ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-12-00246-CR
    EX PARTE BENITO MOJICA
    From the 66th District Court
    Hill County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 36090-A
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Benito Mojica entered a plea of nolo
    contendere to the offense of possession of a controlled substance.          The trial court
    convicted Mojica of the offense and assessed punishment at eight years confinement
    and a $500 fine. The trial court suspended imposition of the confinement portion of the
    sentence and placed Mojica on community supervision for eight years.
    On April 25, 2012, Mojica filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the
    trial court seeking to set aside his conviction because he received ineffective assistance
    of counsel. On June 7, 2012, the trial court denied the application for writ of habeas
    corpus, and Mojica filed a notice of appeal in this court. On August 1, 2012, this Court
    notified Mojica that no certification of his right to appeal had been filed. See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 25.2(a)(2). This Court informed Mojica that the proceeding would be dismissed
    within 14 days of that letter unless a certification of defendant’s right to appeal was
    provided to the Court. TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3.
    Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that a “trial court
    shall enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a
    judgment of guilt or other appealable order.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The denial of a
    writ of habeas corpus is an appealable order.       Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for the
    Thirteenth Judicial Dist., 
    159 S.W.3d 645
    , 650 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). “The appeal must
    be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not
    been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
    No certification of defendant’s right to appeal has been provided, and Mojica has
    not sought extraordinary relief in this Court to compel the trial court to enter a
    certification of defendant’s right of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
    AL SCOGGINS
    Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeal Dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed September 13, 2012
    [CR25]
    Ex parte Mojica                                                                       Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-12-00246-CR

Filed Date: 9/13/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015