Anthony Mark Garcia v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-10-00201-CR
    ANTHONY MARK GARCIA,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 220th District Court
    Bosque County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 14271
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Anthony Mark Garcia pled guilty to forgery and received deferred adjudication
    community supervision for a period of three years. The State later moved to proceed to
    an adjudication of guilt, alleging sixteen violations of his conditions of community
    supervision. Garcia pled “not true” to all of the allegations. The trial court found
    allegations 1-4, 8-10, 12, and 16 true, adjudicated Garcia guilty, and sentenced him to
    fifteen months’ confinement in state jail.
    Garcia’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an
    Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in
    his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    ,
    
    18 L. Ed. 2d 493
    (1967). Although informed of his right to do so, Garcia did not file a pro
    se response to the Anders brief.
    In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, . . .
    decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    , 87 S.Ct. at 1400;
    accord Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is
    “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy
    v. Court of Appeals, 
    486 U.S. 429
    , 439 n.10, 
    108 S. Ct. 1895
    , 1902 n.10, 
    100 L. Ed. 2d 440
    (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find
    this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment.
    We grant appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Garcia.
    Notwithstanding this grant, appointed counsel must send Garcia a copy of our decision,
    notify him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this
    Court a letter certifying counsel’s compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
    48.4. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 
    206 S.W.3d 670
    , 673-74 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2006).
    REX D. DAVIS
    Justice
    Garcia v. State                                                                       Page 2
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Affirmed
    Opinion delivered and filed August 9, 2012
    Do not publish
    [CR25]
    Garcia v. State                              Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-10-00201-CR

Filed Date: 8/9/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015