in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, Rolando Renteria and Michelle Raney ( 2014 )

NUMBER 13-14-00558-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD FREYMANN,
ROLANDO RENTERIA, AND MICHELLE RANEY
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relators, State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, Rolando Renteria, and Michelle
Raney, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct
respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District
Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in
abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought against relators by
the real parties in interest, Leopoldo Aguilar and Maria Aguilar, until sixty days after they
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
provide relators with a notice letter for their claim stating the specific, separate amounts
for the claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154 (West,
Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw
through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original
Proceedings). In addition, relators request that this Court issue immediate temporary
relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.10 (“Temporary Relief”).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be
denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard
Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL 4243701, at **4–9 (Tex.
App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op). Accordingly, the
Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary
relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
25th day of September, 2014.
2