in Re State Farm LLoyds ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                  NUMBER 13-14-00529-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
    Relator, State Farm Lloyds, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting
    that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of
    the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relator’s
    verified plea in abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought
    against relator by the real parties in interest, Francisco Perez and Maria Alma Perez, until
    sixty days after they provide relator with a notice letter for their claim stating the specific,
    1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
    required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
    separate amounts for the claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE
    ANN. § 541.154 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); 
    id. § 541.155
    (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1
    (“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). In addition, relator requests that this Court
    issue immediate temporary relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in
    abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10 (“Temporary Relief”).
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
    and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be
    denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard
    Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 
    2014 WL 4243701
    , at **4–9 (Tex.
    App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op).          Accordingly, the
    Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary
    relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d).
    PER CURIAM
    Delivered and filed the
    19th day of September, 2014.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-14-00529-CV

Filed Date: 9/19/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015