Richard Lares v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                      The State of TexasAppellee
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    Tuesday, April 7, 2015
    No. 04-15-00183-CR
    Richard LARES,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2006CR10110
    Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On August 10, 2009, the trial court imposed sentence on Appellant Richard Lares.
    Because the judgment incorrectly recited the date of offense, on January 26, 2015, the trial court
    signed a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc correcting the date of offense. On March 5, 2015, Appellant
    filed a Motion to Arrest Judgment. Contra TEX. R. APP. P. 22.3 (requiring a motion in arrest of
    judgment to be filed “no later than 30 days after[] the date when the trial court imposes or
    suspends sentence in open court”). On March 19, 2015, Appellant filed a Notice of Intent to
    Appeal.
    A judgment nunc pro tunc is an appealable order. Blanton v. State, 
    369 S.W.3d 894
    , 903
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). However, to perfect an appeal the notice of appeal must be filed within
    thirty days of the date that the trial court signs the judgment nunc pro tunc. Dewalt v. State, 
    417 S.W.3d 678
    , 689 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013), pet. ref’d, 
    426 S.W.3d 100
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
    Here, the trial court signed the Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc on January 26, 2015;
    Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on February 25, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1);
    
    Dewalt, 417 S.W.3d at 689
    . A motion for extension of time to file was due on March 12, 2015.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 (Extension of Time); Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1996). No motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was filed.
    “If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, the court of appeals has no option but to dismiss
    the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” Castillo v. State, 
    369 S.W.3d 196
    , 198 (Tex. Crim. App.
    2012).
    We ORDER Appellant Richard Lares to show cause in writing within THIRTY DAYS of
    the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See
    
    Blanton, 369 S.W.3d at 903
    .
    All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.
    _________________________________
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 7th day of April, 2015.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00183-CR

Filed Date: 4/7/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015