Cameron Jarell Smith v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Order filed September 27, 2012

     

                                                                           In The

                                                                                 

      Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                       __________

     

                                        Nos. 11-12-00132-CR & 11-12-00133-CR

                                                        __________

     

                                CAMERON JARELL SMITH, Appellant

     

                                                                 V.

     

                                          STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

                                        On Appeal from the 29th District Court

     

                                                             Palo Pinto County, Texas

     

                                                 Trial Court Cause Nos. 14640 & 14641

     

     

                                                                         O R D E R

                The State, joined by Cameron Jarell Smith, has filed an agreed motion to suspend the rules of appellate procedure in order to abate these appeals and permit the parties to file an out-of-time motion for new trial in the trial court.  The parties seek the requested relief pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 2.  They contend that a suspension of the rules under Rule 2 is warranted in the interest of justice in light of evidence discovered subsequent to appellant’s convictions “that leads the attorney for the State to reasonably believe that evidence adduced at the trial was obtained in violation of [a]ppellant’s rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

                This court appreciates the parties’ candor and their efforts to obtain justice in an expedient manner.   However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held in Oldham v. State, 977 S.W.2d 354 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998), that Rule 2 cannot be used to extend the thirty-day deadline for filing a motion for new trial.  See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(a). Accordingly, the agreed motion to suspend the rules of appellate procedure is denied.

     

                                                                                                    PER CURIAM                      

     

    September 27, 2012

    Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

    Panel[1] consists of: Wright, C.J.,

    McCall, J., and Hill.[2]



    [1]Eric Kalenak, Justice, resigned effective September 3, 2012.  The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a successor by the governor or until the next general election.

     

    [2]John G. Hill, Former Chief Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-12-00132-CR

Filed Date: 9/27/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015