State v. Joseph T. Reed ( 2009 )

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-293-CV
THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT
V.
JOSEPH T. REED APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss For Mootness.” It
is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss
the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); State Farm Mut. Auto Ins.
Co. v. Smith, No. 02-03-00046-CV, 2003 WL 22071455, at * 1 (Tex.
App.—Fort Worth Aug. 29, 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution
issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: November 25, 2009
1
 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.