in the Estate of Raquel E. Wise ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                          NUMBER 13-13-00585-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    IN THE ESTATE OF RAQUEL E. WISE, DECEASED
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
    of Cameron County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
    Appellant, Nelda Wise Rodriguez, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order on
    a judgment of inventory allegedly rendered on October 29, 2013, in trial court cause no.
    2013-CPC-105. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that there
    was no final, appealable judgment dated October 29, 2013, and that it appeared that the
    purported appeal had not been timely perfected insofar as the judgment of inventory in
    the clerk’s record was rendered on September 18, 2013. On November 6, 2013, the
    Clerk of this Court notified appellant of these defects so that steps could be taken to
    correct the defects, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3.    Appellant was
    advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of
    the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to
    respond to the Court’s notice.
    In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review
    final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute.        Lehmann v.
    Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001). The Court, having considered the
    documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defects in this matter, is of the
    opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the
    appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c).
    Pending motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
    PER CURIAM
    Delivered and filed the
    30th day of January, 2014.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-13-00585-CV

Filed Date: 1/30/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015