Kendrick Lee Jones v. State ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                        COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 2-09-101-CR
    KENDRICK LEE JONES                                   APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                         STATE
    ------------
    FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY
    ------------
    MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
    ------------
    1
    … See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    Appellant Kendrick Lee Jones attempts to appeal the trial court’s
    judgment sentencing him to ten years’ imprisonment for robbery. We dismiss
    the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    The trial court imposed Appellant’s sentence on November 8, 2007.
    Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial; thus, his notice of appeal was due
    within ninety days—that is, on or before February 6, 2008. See Tex. R. App.
    P. 26.2(a)(1).    Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until April 8,
    2009—over a year late.
    On April 13, 2009, we notified Appellant that because of the apparent
    untimeliness of his appeal, we would dismiss the appeal unless he or any party
    desiring to continue the appeal responded by April 23, 2009, and showed
    grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant did not file a response.
    The lack of a timely notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction.
    See State v. Riewe, 
    13 S.W.3d 408
    , 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Olivo v.
    State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Williams v. State, 
    76 S.W.3d 207
    , 209 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.). Therefore, because
    Appellant failed to timely file his notice of appeal and failed to provide us with
    2
    grounds for continuing his appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction.2 See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
    PER CURIAM
    PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    DELIVERED: May 21, 2009
    2
    … We note that Appellant is not without recourse because he may seek
    an out-of-time appeal by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the
    court of criminal appeals. See, e.g., Ex parte Pinner, No. AP-75802, 
    2007 WL 4305516
    , at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 5, 2007) (not designated for publication)
    (holding that habeas corpus applicant whose attorney had failed to timely file
    a written notice of appeal was entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time
    appeal to his judgment of conviction); see generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.
    art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2008).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-09-00101-CR

Filed Date: 5/21/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/4/2015