michelle-d-martz-dc-and-trinity-wellness-center-pc-and-eric-hale-and ( 2009 )

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

                                        NO. 2-08-388-CV

MICHELLE D. MARTZ, D.C. AND                                          APPELLANTS

TRINITY WELLNESS CENTER, P.C.                                   AND APPELLEES

                                                   V.

ERIC HALE AND MARGARET HALE                                         APPELLEES

                                                                               AND APPELLANTS

                                               ----------

            FROM THE 362nd DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered the parties= AAgreement Regarding Disposition Of Appeals,@ which we construe to be a motion for disposition. It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.^[2]  Accordingly, without regard to the merits, we vacate the trial court=s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties= settlement agreement.^[3]

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.^[4]

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  April 23, 2009

---

^[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

^[2]The parties ask us to render a judgment affirming in part and setting aside in part.  We cannot do both.  Rule 42.1(a)(2) permits us only to either render judgment effectuating the parties= agreements or set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B); Cunningham v. Cunningham, 2-08-362-CV, 2008 WL 5479677, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Oct. 30, 2008, no pet.) (memo op.).

^[3]See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).

^[4]See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.