Otto Ray Kietzman v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-14-00432-CR
    Otto Ray KIETZMAN,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2013W0631
    Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Karen Angelini, Justice
    Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
    Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2014
    AFFIRMED
    Otto Ray Kietzman appeals from an order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus
    challenging his extradition to Alabama. Kietzman’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in
    which he examines the record and discusses potential issues but ultimately concludes that this
    appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967); High v. State,
    
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that Kietzman was provided with copies
    of the brief and the motion to withdraw, and was further informed of his right to review the record
    04-14-00432-CR
    and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
    1997, no pet.). Kietzman has not filed a pro se brief.
    We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we agree that this appeal is frivolous
    and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the
    motion to withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997,
    no pet.); 
    Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177
    n.1.
    No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Kietzman wish to seek further review of
    this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition
    for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for
    discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this opinion;
    or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the
    requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00432-CR

Filed Date: 12/23/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015