Alice Spratling v. Cach, LLC ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 30, 2013.
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-13-01392-CV
    ALICE SPRATLING, Appellant
    V.
    CACH, LLC, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-14767
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Evans
    Opinion by Justice Evans
    In a letter dated November 4, 2013, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal.
    Specifically, it appeared there was no final judgment because the trial court had granted
    appellant’s motion for new trial. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our
    concern and gave appellee an opportunity to respond. Appellant filed a letter brief but failed to
    address the jurisdictional issue. Appellee did not file a response.
    Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. See Lehmann v. Har–Con
    Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001). When a motion for new trial is granted, the case is
    reinstated on the trial court’s docket and will stand for trial the same as though the previous
    judgment never existed. See Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 
    160 S.W.3d 559
    , 563
    (Tex.2005). An order granting a new trial deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction over the
    appeal. See Yan v. Jiang, 
    241 S.W.3d 930
     (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.).
    The trial court signed a final default judgment on July 23, 2013. Appellant filed both a
    timely motion for new trial and a notice of appeal on August 5, 2013. The trial court signed an
    order granting appellant’s motion for new trial on August 16, 2013. Because the trial court
    granted appellant’s motion for new trial, there is no final judgment. See Wilkins, 
    160 S.W.3d at 563
    ; Yan, 241, S.W.3d at 930. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    /David Evans/
    DAVID EVANS
    JUSTICE
    131392F.P05
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    ALICE SPRATLING, Appellant                          On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District
    Court, Dallas County, Texas.
    No. 05-13-01392-CV        V.                        Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-14767.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Evans.
    CACH, LLC, Appellee                                 Justices Moseley and Bridges, participating.
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
    It is ORDERED that appellee, CACH, LLC, recover its costs of this appeal from
    appellant, ALICE SPRATLING.
    Judgment entered this 30th day of December, 2013.
    /David Evans/
    DAVID EVANS
    JUSTICE
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-13-01392-CV

Filed Date: 12/30/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015