Randall Joseph Boudreaux v. State ( 2013 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00092-CR
Randall Joseph Boudreaux, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. C-1-CR-09-209499; HONORABLE CARLOS HUMBERTO BARRERA, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted appellant Randall Joseph Boudreaux of driving while intoxicated,
and the trial court assessed punishment at 180 days imprisonment and a $2,000 fine, probated
for two years. Boudreaux appealed, but never made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record.
In November 2012, after counsel failed to respond to our notice that the brief was overdue, we
abated the appeal to the trial court for a hearing pursuant to rule 38.8(b). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)
(when brief is not filed in criminal case, appellate court should abate cause to trial court for hearing
to determine whether defendant is indigent, wishes to prosecute appeal, or has been abandoned
by counsel).
The trial court responded by informing us that it attempted to conduct the hearing but
that Boudreaux did not appear. The court said that Boudreaux initially agreed to appear but then
called the court to say he would not appear but that he had hired an attorney to represent him. No
attorney appeared at the hearing, however, and the trial court stated it had issued a capias and set
an appeal bond amount. Boudreaux’s retained attorney has filed a motion to withdraw, explaining
that Boudreaux will not return counsel’s phone calls and had “vanished.” Counsel does not have a
mailing address for Boudreaux and does not know his whereabouts, and the only contact numbers
he has for Boudreaux are for a pager and a fax machine.
Because Boudreaux has ceased communicating with his retained attorney and the
trial court, has not arranged for a new attorney to represent him, and has not arranged for the
reporter’s record to be filed or to file a brief, we submitted this case for submission without a brief,
as required by rule 38.8(b)(4). See id.
Based on our review of the clerk’s record, the only record on file in his cause, we
have not found any fundamental error. See Burton v. State, 267 S.W.3d 101, 103 (Tex. App.—Corpus
Christi 2008, no pet.) (explaining process of considering criminal appeal when defendant does not
file brief). We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Affirmed
Filed: May 15, 2013
Do Not Publish
2