Johnny Ferris AKA Johnny Wayne Ferris v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-13-00701-CR
    Johnny Ferris aka Johnny Wayne Ferris, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. A-13-0162-SB, THE HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    A jury convicted appellant Johnny Ferris, aka Johnny Wayne Ferris, of the felony
    offense of evading detention with a vehicle, see Tex. Penal Code § 38.04(a), (b)(2), and, pursuant
    to the habitual offender punishment provision of the Penal Code, assessed his punishment at 99 years
    in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, see 
    id. § 12.42(d).
    Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a
    brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements
    of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why
    there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744
    (1967); Garner v. State, 
    300 S.W.3d 763
    , 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,
    
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988).
    The record reflects that appellant’s counsel provided a copy of the brief to appellant
    along with a letter advising appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
    brief. See 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    ; 
    Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766
    . This Court also gave appellant an
    additional 30 days to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.
    We have conducted an independent review of the record and find no reversible error.
    See 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    ; 
    Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766
    ; Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826-27
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious
    grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial
    court’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.
    __________________________________________
    J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
    Affirmed
    Filed: June 24, 2014
    Do Not Publish
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-13-00701-CR

Filed Date: 6/24/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/17/2015