Larry Randall Steele v. State ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-10-00424-CR
    LARRY RANDALL STEELE,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 278th District Court
    Madison County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 11,379
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Larry Randall Steele was convicted in a bench trial of the offense of possession of
    cocaine less than one gram. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115 (West 2010).
    He was sentenced to two years confinement in a state jail facility. The trial court
    assessed attorney’s fees in the judgment. In one issue, Steele challenges the sufficiency
    of the evidence to support the trial court’s assessment of attorney’s fees. We modify the
    trial court’s judgment, and affirm it as modified.
    For the purposes of assessing attorney's fees, once an accused is found to be
    indigent, he is presumed to remain so through the proceedings absent proof of a
    material change in his circumstances. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(p) (West
    Supp. 2011); Mayer v. State, 
    309 S.W.3d 552
    , 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Watkins v. State,
    
    333 S.W.3d 771
    , 782 (Tex. App.—Waco 2010, pet. ref’d). Accordingly if the defendant is
    found to be indigent at the outset of trial, there must be some evidence presented to the
    trial court of a change in financial circumstances before attorney's fees can be assessed
    against the defendant. See 
    Mayer, 309 S.W.3d at 553
    .
    In this case, Steele was found to be indigent prior to trial and was appointed trial
    counsel. No evidence indicating a change in his financial circumstances was proffered
    during the trial. Additionally, the trial court determined that Steele was indigent for
    purposes of appeal, ordered the appointment of appellate counsel, and granted Steele a
    free record on appeal on account of his indigence. The State agrees that there is no
    evidence to support the trial court’s assessment of attorney’s fees. Accordingly, as the
    presumption of indigence remains, we hold that the evidence is insufficient to support
    the trial court's assessment of attorney’s fees. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art.
    26.04(p) (West Supp. 2011); 
    Mayer, 309 S.W.3d at 557
    ; Watkins, 
    333 S.W.3d 771
    , 782.
    Steele’s sole issue is sustained.
    Having found the evidence to be insufficient, we modify the trial court's
    judgment to delete the order to pay attorney's fees and order Steele to pay only the costs
    Steele v. State                                                                       Page 2
    of court in the amount of $280.00. See 
    Mayer, 309 S.W.3d at 557
    . The trial court’s
    judgment, as modified, is affirmed.
    TOM GRAY
    Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Affirmed as modified
    Opinion delivered and filed December 7, 2011
    Do not publish
    [CR25]
    Steele v. State                                                             Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-10-00424-CR

Filed Date: 12/7/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015