Calvin Wayne Burnham v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                                             In The

                                                    Court of Appeals

                            Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

     

                                                    ______________________________

     

                                                                 No. 06-10-00045-CR

                                                    ______________________________

     

     

                                  CALVIN WAYNE BURNHAM, Appellant

     

                                                                    V.

     

                                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

     

     

     

                                           On Appeal from the 123rd Judicial District Court

                                                                 Panola County, Texas

                                                           Trial Court No. 2005-C-0008

     

                                                   

     

     

     

                                              Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                                  Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter


                                                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

                Calvin Wayne Burnham appeals from his convictions by the trial court on four charges of aggravated sexual assault of a child and four charges of indecency with a child.  Burnham has filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals.[1]  He argues that the trial court committed reversible error in considering evidence from a previous revocation hearing when granting the State’s second amended motion to adjudicate guilt and in admitting the results of a polygraph examination.  Burnham also complains that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he violated any conditions of his community supervision.

                We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Burnham’s appeal in cause number 06-10-00038-CR.  For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that reversible error has not been shown in this case.

                We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

     

     

     

                                                                                        Jack Carter     

                                                                                        Justice

     

    Date Submitted:          December 14, 2010    

    Date Decided:             December 15, 2010

     

    Do Not Publish



    [1]Burnham appeals from four convictions of aggravated sexual assault of a child and four convictions of indecency with a child, cause numbers 06-10-00038-CR through 06-10-00045-CR.

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-10-00045-CR

Filed Date: 12/15/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015