Ex Parte Zachary Pistolis ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                     In The
    Court of Appeals
    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
    No. 06-18-00169-CR
    EX PARTE ZACHARY PISTOLIS
    On Appeal from the 202nd District Court
    Bowie County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 16F0489-202
    Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Zachary Pistolis has filed an untimely notice of direct appeal from the trial court’s denial
    of his pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Pistolis challenged the indictment filed against him in the trial court through a pretrial
    application for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court denied that application on October 10,
    2017. Pistolis filed a notice of appeal from that order on September 24, 2018. When a trial court
    denies a pretrial application for habeas corpus relief, the applicant can immediately appeal. See
    Ex parte McCullough, 
    966 S.W.2d 529
    , 531 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Green v. State, 
    999 S.W.2d 474
    , 476 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1999, pet. ref’d). However, under the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure, such appeal must be perfected within thirty days of the date the appealable order was
    entered. See 
    Green, 999 S.W.2d at 476
    . The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held
    that, without a timely notice of appeal, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. See Olivo
    v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    ,
    209 n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
    We notified Pistolis by letter that his notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the
    appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. We gave Pistolis ten days to respond to
    our letter and demonstrate how, notwithstanding the defect herein noted, we had jurisdiction over
    the appeal. We received no response.
    2
    Because Pistolis did not timely file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Ralph K. Burgess
    Justice
    Date Submitted:        October 30, 2018
    Date Decided:          October 31, 2018
    Do Not Publish
    3