James Hudgens v. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Abatement Order filed November 6, 2018
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-18-00938-CV
    ____________
    JAMES HUDGENS, Appellant
    V.
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 55th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2016-40798
    ABATEMENT ORDER
    Plaintiff/appellant filed a notice of appeal from an order signed August 22,
    2018, granting defendant’s/appellee’s motion for summary judgment. The order
    lacks decretal language (e.g. “ordered, adjudged, and decreed”). Decretal means the
    granting or denying of the remedy sought. In re Wilmington Trust, N.A., 
    524 S.W.3d 790
    , 792 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, orig. proceeding). “An order that
    merely grants a motion for judgment is in no sense a judgment itself. It adjudicates
    nothing.” Naaman v. Grider, 
    126 S.W.3d 73
    , 74 (Tex. 2003) (per curiam). Without
    decretal language, the order granting summary judgment is not a final or otherwise
    appealable judgment. See Wilmington 
    Trust, 524 S.W.3d at 792
    .
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2 provides:
    The appellate court may allow an appealed order that is not final to be
    modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and
    all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.
    Tex. R. App. P. 27.2.
    Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand to the trial court to permit the
    parties to obtain a final judgment. Any party who wishes to appeal from such a final
    judgment shall file an amended notice of appeal. A supplemental clerk’s record
    containing any such judgment and a transcript of any hearing held in connection with
    this order shall be filed in this court by December 6, 2018.
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
    active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the
    supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. The court will also consider an
    appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may
    reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking
    reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing,
    if a hearing is required, in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not
    request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and
    notify the parties of such date.
    PER CURIAM
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-18-00938-CV

Filed Date: 11/6/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2018