Daniel, Brandon ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                       AP-77,034
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Transmitted 4/15/2015 4:28:17 PM
    April 15, 2015                                                     Accepted 4/15/2015 4:31:44 PM
    ABEL ACOSTA
    NO. AP-77,034                                               CLERK
    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AT AUSTIN, TEXAS
    ________________________________________
    BRANDON DANIEL,
    APPELLANT
    VS.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    APPELLEE
    ________________________________________
    THE STATE’S MOTION TO ABATE APPEAL
    TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL
    APPEALS:
    The State of Texas, by and through the District Attorney for Travis
    County, respectfully moves this Court for its order abating the instant appeal
    and remanding this cause to the trial court for a hearing on appellant’s desire
    to dismiss his counsel, proceed pro se, and waive all appeals
    In support of the instant motion, the State asserts as follows:
    1. Procedural Background and Relevant Facts
    The State charged appellant by indictment with the capital murder of
    Austin Police Officer Jaime Padron committed on April 6, 2012. (CR 100,
    118-119). A jury found appellant guilty of capital murder (CR 184), and
    pursuant to the jury’s answers to the special issues at punishment, the trial
    court sentenced appellant to death on February 28, 2014. (CR 189-190; RR
    26: 221). Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, which was overruled
    by operation of law, and notice of appeal. (CR 196, 197). The trial court
    appointed attorney Ariel Payan to represent appellant on direct appeal
    pursuant to appellant’s desire to be represented by counsel. (CR 205; RR
    26: 219).
    On the same day of sentencing, the trial judge found the appellant to be
    indigent and that the appellant desired to have counsel appointed for the
    purpose of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Art. 11.071, V.A.C.C.P.. (CR
    192; RR 26: 220). The trial judge therefore entered an order appointing the
    Office of Capital Writs and Director Brad Levenson as counsel to investigate
    the case, file the appropriate writ, and fully represent appellant. (CR 192).
    On January 16, 2015, Payan timely filed a brief on direct appeal on
    appellant’s behalf. The State’s brief on direct appeal is currently due on
    April 20, 2015, but the State anticipates requesting additional time in which
    to complete its responsive brief.
    2. This Appeal Should Be Abated
    On March 4, 2015, appellant filed a letter with the District Clerk’s Office
    of Travis County. See Exhibit A, certified copy of appellant’s letter,
    attached to this motion. In the letter directed to the judge of the convicting
    2
    court, appellant expresses his desire to dismiss his direct appeal attorney,
    Ariel Payan, dismiss the brief Payan filed on his behalf, proceed pro se, and
    waive all appeals. Appellant also indicates his desire to dismiss the Office
    of Capital Writs and Brad Levenson on habeas review, proceed pro se, and
    waive habeas review.1
    Appellate review of a death sentence is automatic and cannot be waived.
    Art. 37.071(h), V.A.C.C.P. Thus, an appellant must either be represented by
    counsel on direct appeal or he must proceed pro se. The State submits that
    this Court should abate this appeal and remand this case to the trial court for
    a hearing to determine whether (1) the appellant understands that he cannot
    waive his right to direct appeal, (2) the appellant really desires to dismiss
    Payan and proceed pro se, (3) the appellant has been advised of the dangers
    and disadvantages of self-representation if he chooses to represent himself
    on direct appeal, see e.g., Burgess v. State, 
    816 S.W.2d 424
    (Tex.Crim.App.
    1991), and (4) the appellant is competent to make these decisions, see Rees
    v. Peyton, 
    384 U.S. 312
    (1966).
    On the other hand, the law does not require the filing of an application
    for writ of habeas corpus, and an applicant may waive his right to habeas
    1
    Additionally, in a letter dated March 26, 2015, and addressed to Travis County District
    Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg, appellant expressed his desire to waive his appeals and
    sought the District Attorney’s help “to expedite the situation.”
    3
    review. Ex parte Reynoso, 
    257 S.W.3d 715
    (Tex.Crim.App. 2008). Since
    the trial court appointed counsel to present appellant on habeas review and
    the appellant now expresses his desire to dismiss counsel and waive habeas
    review, the State submits that abatement and remand are necessary for the
    trial court to additionally determine whether the appellant wishes to file an
    application for writ of habeas corpus and, if he does not, whether he has
    made this decision knowingly and voluntarily. See Reynoso, AP-74,952,
    Order dated September 15, 2004. If the appellant does wish to pursue
    habeas review, the trial court should determine whether appellant wishes to
    dismiss his appointed counsel and proceed pro se and, if he does, whether he
    has made this decision knowingly and voluntarily.
    4
    PRAYER
    Wherefore, the State requests that this Court abate the instant appeal
    and remand this cause to the trial court for a hearing on appellant’s desire to
    proceed pro se and waive all appeals.
    Respectfully submitted,
    ROSEMARY LEHMBERG
    District Attorney
    Travis County, Texas
    /s/ Lisa Stewart
    Lisa Stewart
    Assistant District Attorney
    Director, Appellate Division
    State Bar No. 06022700
    P.O. Box 1748
    Austin, Texas 78767
    Phone No. (512) 854-3626
    Fax. No. (512) 854-4810
    Lisa.Stewart@traviscountytx.gov
    AppellateTCDA@traviscountytx.gov
    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
    Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i), I hereby certify,
    based on the computer program used to generate this document, that this
    document contains 758 words, excluding words contained in those parts of
    the document that Rule 9.4(i) exempts from inclusion in the word count.
    /s/ Lisa Stewart
    Lisa Stewart
    Assistant District Attorney
    5
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that, on this 15th day of April, 2015, a copy of the
    foregoing motion was sent, via U.S. mail, email, facsimile, or electronically
    through the electronic filing manager, to the following attorneys for the
    appellant:
    Ariel Payan
    1012 Rio Grande
    Austin, Texas 78701
    Fax: 512-472-4102
    ArielPayan@hotmail.com
    Brad Levenson
    Office of Capital Writs
    Stephen F. Austin Building
    1700 N. Congress Avenue, Suite 460
    Austin, Texas 78701
    Fax: 512-463-8590
    Brad.Levenson@OCW.Texas.gov
    Lisa C. McMinn
    State Prosecuting Attorney
    P.O. Box 13046
    Austin, Texas 78711-3046
    Lisa.McMinn@spa.texas.gov
    /s/ Lisa Stewart
    Lisa Stewart
    Assistant District Attorney
    6
    EXHIBIT A
    7
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-77,034

Filed Date: 4/15/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016