Maryann Castro v. MLB Sub I, LLC ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    July 11, 2016
    No. 04-16-00189-CV
    Maryann CASTRO,
    Appellant
    v.
    MLB SUB I, LLC,
    Appellee
    From the County Court, Atascosa County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 4343
    Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On July 1, 2016, after the trial court determined that Appellant is indigent but her appeal
    is frivolous, we advised Appellant she is not entitled to a free record on appeal. See TEX. CIV.
    PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 13.003 (West 2002); De La Vega v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 
    974 S.W.2d 152
    , 154 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). We noted Appellant had not filed either (1)
    written proof that the reporter’s fee has been paid or (2) her brief.
    We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed
    for want of prosecution and include a reasonable explanation for her failure to timely file the
    brief. See 
    id. R. 38.8(a),
    42.3(b), (c); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 
    975 S.W.2d 61
    , 63 (Tex.
    App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). We warned Appellant that if she failed to show cause as
    ordered, her appeal could be dismissed without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c);
    
    Elizondo, 975 S.W.2d at 63
    .
    On July 7, 2016, Appellant filed a two page letter response; it recites facts pertaining to
    the underlying suit and includes forty-two pages of attachments that are not identified as being
    excerpts from the clerk’s record. Her response argues her appeal should not be dismissed, but it
    does not provide a reasonable explanation for her failure to timely file the brief or meet the
    requirements for an appellate brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1.
    We ORDER Appellant to file her brief within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.
    The brief must fully comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See, e.g., TEX. R.
    APP. P. 9.4, 9.5, 38.1.
    If Appellant’s brief does not comply with this order, we “may strike the brief, prohibit
    [Appellant] from filing another, and proceed as if [Appellant] had failed to file a brief.” See 
    id. R. 38.9(a);
    see also 
    id. R. 38.8(a)
    (authorizing this court to dismiss an appeal if an appellant fails
    to timely file a brief).
    _________________________________
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 11th day of July, 2016.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-16-00189-CV

Filed Date: 7/11/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/13/2016