Munoz, Juan Ricardo ( 2015 )

10%O\
X,
rehear y ±}qo/s~-
RECEIVED \H
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
FEB 06 2015
is!
'rJ
l> ' x7 MOSTiMpbtTAdTmfrtfar.
Pe^&ty&l^fa^
Uapklitiscoe-ijm-f
h6n. cki&f 'Saslfct,) f-te/e+J k&((er
RE: QUESTION OF LAW/DISCRETIONAL AUTHORITY
DEAR (\KSACe,U2010 WL 546676 (Tex. App.—El Paso, Feb. 17, 2010, pet. dtsm'd).
2See Haines v. Kerner, 404U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (holding/^ se pleadings to less stringent
standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers); see also Franklin v. Rose, 765 F.2d 82, 85 (6th Cir.
1985) (explaining that liberal construction allows for active interpretation ofapro se pleading to
encompass any allegation which may raise aclaim for federal relief).
ATTACHMENT (A)