in the Interest of the D. Children, a Child ( 2015 )

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed March 30, 2015.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-00383-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.D. AND B.D., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court
Grayson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. FA-14-0446
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans
Opinion by Justice Fillmore
Appellant E.A.W. filed her notice of appeal on March 25, 2015, contesting the trial
court’s January 6, 2015 order terminating her parental rights to A.D. and B.D. On March 26,
2015, E.A.W. filed a motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal.
An appeal in a parental termination case is governed by the rules of appellate procedure
that relate to accelerated appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a)(1); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(a)
(West 2014). The notice of an accelerated appeal must be filed within twenty days of the date
the judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). An appellate court may extend the time to file a
notice of appeal if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party
files a notice of appeal in the trial court and files a motion to extend time for filing a notice of
appeal, complying with rule of appellate procedure 10.5(b), in the appellate court. TEX. R. APP.
P. 26.3. However, “[f]iling a motion for new trial, any other post-trial motion, or a request for
findings of fact will not extend the time to perfect an accelerated appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P.
28.1(b); see also In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 927 (Tex. 2005). Without a timely filed notice
of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b); Lab. Corp. of Am. v. Mid-
Town Surgical Ctr., Inc., 16 S.W.3d 527, 529 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2000, no pet.) (“A timely filed
notice of appeal is a requirement for this Court’s jurisdiction.”).
The trial court signed the order of termination in this case on January 6, 2015.
Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due by January 26, 2015. E.A.W. filed her notice of
appeal on March 25, 2015, fifty-eight days after the deadline for filing her notice of appeal and
forty-three days after the deadline to file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of
appeal.
In her motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal, E.A.W. states she filed a motion for
new trial that was denied by written order on March 20, 2015. She acknowledges in her motion
for leave to file an out-of-time appeal that her motion for new trial did not extend the deadline
for filing her accelerated appeal. Because E.A.W.’s notice of appeal was untimely, this Court
lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See In re S.H., No. 05-14-01478-CV, 2015 WL 84674 (Tex.
App—Dallas Jan. 7, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re M.H., No. 05-14-01014-CV, 2014 WL
5487752 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 15, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.).
For these reasons, we deny E.A.W.’s “Motion for Leave to File Out-of-Time Appeal,”
and we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Robert M. Fillmore/
ROBERT M. FILLMORE
JUSTICE
150383F.P05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF A.D. AND B.D., On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District
CHILDREN Court, Grayson County, Texas,
Trial Court Cause No. FA-14-0446.
No. 05-15-00383-CV Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore,
Justices Myers and Evans participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want
of jurisdiction.
It is ORDERED that appellant bear her own costs of this appeal.
Judgment entered this 30th day of March, 2015.
–3–